Forum:Smash Wiki: The Movie: Part 2
Smash Wiki: The Movie: Part 2: Prepare for Violated Expectations Is Here! And So is a New Forum About It!
Yeah. This one stinks, but just so you guys don't totally lose confidence in us, we're going (to try) to release a trailer for part 3 (which will surpass any expectation you ever, ever had for anything retarded) sometime very soon.
Anyway, this is part 2. I did this when I was supposed to be studying for midterms, while I was burned out during midterms, and way after I cared about animating in MSPaint. That's why part 3 is completely live action. So basically, look forward for part 3 coming earliest in 2 weeks. We have our huge tournament this and next weekend so that'll slow things down. Anyway, I hope I can get at least one laugh. Maybe. Semicolon (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
... Yeah... JtM =^] (talk) 05:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I loved it, but I guess that could be because I connected with it. But I am going to ask: do you really consider me a troll? :( --Shadowcrest 05:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Not at all. We had to have some plot continuity. How else was I going to get Willy on Wheels involved if not for some cleverly placed treachery? Thanks for being my plot device, Shadowcrest. Semicolon (talk) 05:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I wasn't in a cleverly placed cameo this time : ( Hopefully there will be a LIVE ACTION CHEEZ PERSON next time. I didn't like this one so much, but, then again, sequels are never as good. I still have high expectations for a live-action sequel, though... on wheels. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 06:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Who?
Who is willy on wheels? Solar flute (talk)
- Only the most famous vandalist ever! A sysop could probably explain the whole story to you better than I could. Cheezperson {talk}stuff
WHAT ABOUT ME?????
Why wasn't I in it? ParaGoomba348 (C'mon, just talk to me) 12:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- possibly because you don't vandalize and arent a sysoop. Those people are the most important JtM =^] (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, why wasn't he? Red Heart (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not in it. Crap. Can I be in the third? Masterman What's the matter? Scared?
I want to be in it too. - GalaxiaD (talk) 21:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm surprised, GXD, that you weren't mentioned in the first one with most of the AD. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
So let me get this straight...
Since I don't have any higher-up position other than just being a normal editor (nor do I do enough to get anything), all I have to do to be in this movie is argue, be a troll, and vandalize? Why don't good people get a role!? I could be...like...idk...some random victim for the next great evil or something! Shade (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Why do you even want...well, nevermind. CAFINATOR Indeed 00:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Cafinator, please stop posting vague and opinionated criticisms of the movies. Both of the movies are completely centered on criticizing me- what do you have to complain about? --Shadowcrest 01:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- So what, I don't even have freedom of speech in the Forums unless I'm kissing up? CAFINATOR Indeed 01:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Fine, I'll stop criticizing. Today, at least. CAFINATOR Indeed 01:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Don't overread into my comments, please. If your comment had anything constructive, I'd let it stay. But saying "these movies are baed lolkthx" isn't constructive, it's trolling. --Shadowcrest 01:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- WELL GEE YOU COULD'VE ENDED THE CONVERSATION THERE BUT THX LOL BYE CAFINATOR Indeed 03:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- But, really, how is that any different from "these movies are funney lolkthx"? CAFINATOR Indeed 03:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's different because compliments are not criticisms. Compliments are fine, even good. Same for constructive criticism. Insults and other unnecessarily critical comments are not. --Shadowcrest 03:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Mmm-hmm... CAFINATOR Indeed 03:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Not that I don't disagree with you, SC, but Caf is doing nothing wrong. He has every right to be angry if he chooses to, as the movie's creators probably didn't ask him if he wanted to appear in them. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Mmm-hmm... CAFINATOR Indeed 03:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's different because compliments are not criticisms. Compliments are fine, even good. Same for constructive criticism. Insults and other unnecessarily critical comments are not. --Shadowcrest 03:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- But, really, how is that any different from "these movies are funney lolkthx"? CAFINATOR Indeed 03:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- WELL GEE YOU COULD'VE ENDED THE CONVERSATION THERE BUT THX LOL BYE CAFINATOR Indeed 03:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Don't overread into my comments, please. If your comment had anything constructive, I'd let it stay. But saying "these movies are baed lolkthx" isn't constructive, it's trolling. --Shadowcrest 01:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Fine, I'll stop criticizing. Today, at least. CAFINATOR Indeed 01:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- So what, I don't even have freedom of speech in the Forums unless I'm kissing up? CAFINATOR Indeed 01:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Reset indentThey didn't ask virtually anyone. Should we delete the forums then?
- I'm not saying he can't be angry. I am saying trolling the forums isn't the right way to go expressing it. --Shadowcrest 03:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
TrollingFlaming. CAFINATOR Indeed 03:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)- Hence the reason why i said i didn't completely disagree with you. Caf, it was just good ol'-fashioned humor. Look at the presidential candidates on SNL. They get burned way more than you have in these harmless movies, and they laugh along with it. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I HATE WHAT I WANT. Boy, that sounds weird. CAFINATOR Indeed 03:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- So, your just
trollingflaming because you want to? Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)- Depends on your point of view. CAFINATOR Indeed 04:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Caf, you get weirder and weirder every time I talk to you. Listen, take the movies as a compliment, people recognize you as a user. They like your sense of humor, no matter how much they won't admit it. 04:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- So, your just
- I HATE WHAT I WANT. Boy, that sounds weird. CAFINATOR Indeed 03:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hence the reason why i said i didn't completely disagree with you. Caf, it was just good ol'-fashioned humor. Look at the presidential candidates on SNL. They get burned way more than you have in these harmless movies, and they laugh along with it. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 03:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
The youtube patrollers who haven't heard of this wiki must be really confused.Solar flute (talk)