[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Talk:Lucina (SSBU)
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Marth vs Lucina.
There are no differences in the basic properties of Lucina's normals and specials, with the exception of the tipper mechanic. This goes for Chrom vs Roy too (except for up special). Lucina's attacks, in general, are 12% more effective than Marth's sourspots, and 25% less effective than Marth's sweetspots. In general, Marth has a higher total damage output because of this. Lucina's consistency is certainly not without merit. Lucina's up tilt actually emulates Marth's move in terms of timing. The same strats can be used with both fighters, since their framedata and attributes are identical. Also, can we stop with the "More Unique Echo Fighter" thing? --Tuffingtons (talk) 15:58, 18 January 2019 (EST)
- It is impossible to make a statement about whose damage is higher without accounting for rates of successful tipping with actual evidence, which you do not have. Please refrain from edit warring. – Emmett 16:17, 18 January 2019 (EST)
