Fascinating concept. Way too meta, though, and would be a big target for vandalism and baseless claims - it seems generally pointless anyway, since user pages cover the concept pretty well. I would never use it. Toomai Glittershine 
02:17, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Don't worry about the baseless claims and vandalism. I'll make sure the content is encyclopedic and objective. Pointless, perhaps, but user pages aren't necessarilly meant for describing oneself. Plus, the wiki would describe big stuff like the vandal war in March, and Smoreking's controversal adminship. I got the idea from how Rationalwiki is like a wiki documenting (in a biased fassion, though) Conservapedia. Anon 02:34, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
This is a terrible idea. First, the things you are talking about documenting are hardly in the top 5 of most important events in shaping SmashWiki. Second, just think about this some more. Exactly how is any of this a good idea? All that will be accomplished by this will be pissing a whole lot of people off. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:21, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- I was kinda joking, but I guess you're kinda right. Anon 04:19, August 13, 2010 (UTC)