SmashWiki talk:Read This First, Man

Add topic
Revision as of 14:46, June 18, 2013 by Scr7 (talk | contribs)

+1 for page name - Ceci n’est pas un Smiddle. 17:42, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

I think we should change the name to "First Start" or something like that, and rename the subheadings section. Awesome Cardinal 2000 21:20, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

I can deal with having to rename the page, but I would still like the acronym to be meaningful. I see no problem with the subsection names. Toomai Glittershine ??? The SMASH-GINEER 18:54, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Support even though this kind of sounds like the Simplified Ruleset. RoyboyX Talk 22:34, 7 June 2013 (EDT)

I'm probably biased but I think this is better than that page because it's less generic and more in line with the current culture. Toomai Glittershine ??? The SMASH-GINEER 18:54, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Support: Bagels. I also have to add to what Tommai said. The simplified ruleset was copied from Wikipedia and doesn't well-reflect SmashWiki. Also, I don't think it gives very good advice. If I were to give advice to a newbie about what or how to edit, this is where I'd point, not the simplified ruleset, as this says exactly what I would say. Another point: I didn't even know the simplified ruleset was here until you mentioned it. We can publicize this better via use of the Welcome Template, the site notice, and/or the main page, and make it more helpful than the simplified ruleset that no one really cares about. DoctorPain99 21:58, 9 June 2013 (EDT), addendum on 19:07, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Support The simplified ruleset we have is pretty useless and nowhere near as helpful as this for a "simple rulest". Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 02:28, 16 June 2013 (EDT)

Support: This is a very smart idea for a first page for newcomers to visit. Good job, Toomai. DarkFox01DF01Sig.pngis a BitF fan 15:39, 18 June 2013 (EDT)

Support: Well written and isn't too long. Overall, great! Scr7FalcoIcon2.jpg 15:46, 18 June 2013 (EDT)