26/11/08 – 05/05/10
41,932
07/05/10 – 28/09/10
38,676
29/09/10 – 22/02/11
40,916
07/03/11 – 23/06/11
39,845
25/06/11 – 09/10/11
6,509
09/10/11 – 21/02/12
47,636
03/03/12 – 03/11/12
40,731
08/11/12 – 19/05/13
41,131
25/05/13 – 27/08/13
45,090
27/08/13 – 23/11/13
46,614
26/11/13 – 23/02/14
41,931
01/03/14 – 06/06/14
51,753
11/06/14 – 08/08/14
51,697
14/08/14 – 03/11/14
46,557
03/11/14 – 13/01/15
46,342
14/01/15 – 08/04/15
47,396
11/04/15 – 15/06/15
36,186
29/04/15 – 14/09/15
47,549
18/09/15 – 05/11/15
54,252
07/11/15 – 04/12/15
38,669
07/12/15 – 15/04/16
51,044
20/04/16 – 16/12/16
39,885
17/12/16 – 26/06/18
36,408
28/06/18 – 31/04/20
53,765
01/04/20 – 24/11/24
33,222

Moving to NIWA

Is this move to NIWA official? I'm just not 100% sure. Shark (talk) 19:15, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

This is more of like the userbase moving and taking their content with them. The old Smash Wiki will still be here, but mostly everyone will be there. So I don't think this would count as being "official". Omega Tyrant  21:14, September 29, 2010 (UTC)


Honestly, IDK. But Megatron1 said that the administrative forces are moving here, so people will be more active here than on the old Smash Wiki. Dang, just looking around makes me feel like I've just moved to a new house. But in this case, unpacking the boxes is basically importing and/or re-uploading content. Actually, I don't really know the purpose of this move. Hopefully, we'll figure it out soon.

Ultrasonicfan (talk) 07:43, 3 October 2010 (EDT)

How are we going to attract new users? Googling "Smashwiki" gets you to the wikia one, not this one. Mr. Anon (talk) 23:36, 4 October 2010 (EDT)


Like I said before, IDK.

Ultrasonicfan (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2010 (EDT)

I agree we need to make the old Smashwiki into a big link that goes to here so we get more users, but there are probably better ideasScoobford (talk) 21:13, 15 October 2010 (EDT)

Except wikia will be mad pissed if we do and will remove it. Before you guys even bother to make a post, at least consider what we already did and what we can't do.--MegaTron1XD  21:31, 15 October 2010 (EDT)
Some of the stuff I will replace with "actual page over here", like the Smash Arena and all my data. I think we should try to make as big a drain as we think we can get away with. Toomai Glittershine   22:25, 15 October 2010 (EDT)

That was more of what i was talking about -Scoobford (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2010 (EDT)

If the edit is good enough, I stole it.--MegaTron1XD  22:40, 15 October 2010 (EDT)

ps.

we should chat. :) – Emmett 20:11, 18 October 2010 (EDT)

Melee Head Icons

Where can you find them? I am trying to upload them. Zeldasmash (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2010 (EDT)

Try SmashBoards. Miles (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2010 (EDT)
Smashboards only has SSBM head icons for the five that didn't return for Brawl (as far as I know). I wouldn't know where to find them otherwise. Toomai Glittershine   19:58, 21 October 2010 (EDT)
No. I already checked, but when i tried to upload them, the entire thing showed up. (They were stuck in a matchup chart, they came along with it). Zeldasmash (talk) 20:02, 21 October 2010 (EDT)
Here are the melee icons. Zeldasmash (talk) 18:18, 24 October 2010 (EDT)

[1]

I apologize the image if it bothers.
Do you know how to separate them from the chart? Zeldasmash (talk) 16:42, 29 October 2010 (EDT)
I probably can, but unless I can get the SSB64 icons from somewhere I won't. We don't need any of the SSBM head icons for right now, so I don't want to put them up unless I can get all of them from all three games. Toomai Glittershine   16:51, 29 October 2010 (EDT)
Those icons are rare, and in the SSB64 matchup chart, only Brawl versions of the icons appeared. Zeldasmash (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2010 (EDT)

Welcome page

Hey, you know what Jello did? Yeah. Ok. Basically, me and Jello are from Bulbapedia. Basically, if you were to add the {{subst:welcome}}, then all one has to do is write that instead of {{subst:welcome|the person being adressed|coding of other user}}. Also, the reason it said Jello was because of the coding here: <includeonly>{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}</includeonly>. Thus, whoever was last to edit that template would have their name on it instead. In other words, if you were the last one to edit that page, it'll say Toomai. Whatever the case, Jello's coding is right. I'll even demonstrate by welcoming another user. If it really doesn't work, then fine. ht14 (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2010 (EDT)

I didn't know about {{REVISIONUSER}}, thanks for that. The main reason I reverted was because he forgot to put in the includeonly, making it appear that he just stuck his name in. I'll put it in properly. Toomai Glittershine   18:18, 29 October 2010 (EDT)
Yeah, sorry about that, I realized that after I saved the page. :P. I'm a girl, btw. Jellotalk 18:30, 29 October 2010 (EDT)