verification
How must this be (officially) verified? Zixor (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Video is the preferred method. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 00:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
-and what would one do with the video? Zixor (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Give me the link, and I will post it. (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 05:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC))
I have no such link. I am merely curious as to the method by which one would go about obtaining verification. As well, I am curious why this article, in particular, requires verification, and what would change should it be "granted". Zixor (talk) 16:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
My guess is that there is' nothing truly required for "verification". Zixor (talk) 20:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I guess the discovery information wasn't redundant. It appeared as such at the time. (Wolf O'Donnell (talk · contributions) 01:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC))