Move proposal
Strong oppose. Can you stop with the pointless article renaming? A redirect with the proposed name already exists, why the heck do we need this? Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 19:12, 27 February 2018 (EST)
- Articles are to be named by their primary topic, which means the term most commonly used for the phrase. In this case, I've seen "Edgehogging" spelled more commonly without a dash (SmashWiki is the only place I've ever seen it spelled with a dash). Just because a redirect exists does not mean this article needs to stay where it is; in many cases the redirect should actually be the correct title. Awesome Cardinal 2000 19:56, 27 February 2018 (EST)
Oppose. There is absolutely no point in renaming an article when the name works both ways and the page has a redirect with the name in question. St. Reggie, Leprachaun 23:42, 27 February 2018 (EST)
- Except we use the more common and popular name as the main title, and if you look onto any sort of Smash-themed website, you'll see that everyone spells it without a dash. As I explained before, a redirect could in fact be the proper title for the page. Awesome Cardinal 2000 21:28, 28 February 2018 (EST)