Talk:Aqua jump (disambiguation)

Could someone please add a video link or video to this page?--MysteryHeff ~ Ike Rox Sox off ^{TALK ~ CONTRIBS} 05:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, couldn't find anything on Youtube :'( Cheezperson {talk}stuff 05:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

would anyone be able to maybe make a video for it then, only if there willing to?--MysteryHeff ~ Ike Rox Sox off ^{TALK ~ CONTRIBS} 11:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

The merge

I say No. For one thing, it's about 2 attacks.--MegaTron1XD 03:14, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

The article's really, really short, though, and I can't think of anything better to do with it. Sir Anon the great 04:01, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

A short article isn't a good reason for a merge. This can occur in the next SSB.--MegaTron1XD 04:04, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

No, but it could easily be explained in both the articles about water gun and FLUDD. Anon 04:09, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Well, It deals with two different articles, so it really can't be merged into both. 25T16 It's-a me! 23:43, 15 August 2011 (EDT)

Since it's only two sentences, it can be mentioned on both pages. Mr. Anon (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2011 (EDT)

Also, it is generally not a good idea to bump a topic that is over a year old. Mr. Anon (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2011 (EDT)

While the topic is over a year old, the merge tag is still on, and the previous conversation came to no consensus/conclusion. So the bump here was perfectly fine. Omega Tyrant 00:53, 16 August 2011 (EDT)

For myself, I think the information here belong in those articles. This isn't really a "technique", or anything notable enough for its own article. Omega Tyrant

Why not putting this ' technique' to both article? (-O-)Lucas-IV- pikaaaa 14:36, 10 September 2011 (EDT)

Maybe it could be a new technique

This could give Mario and Squirtle an advantage in competitive play. Why not make it a strategy? Remember, Vote NO For Issue #2 174.101.76.107 15:55, 7 November 2011 (EST)?????