Talk:Global Smasher Compendium
I moved the French version of the GSC to Global Smasher Compendium/Français, to lean up the article. --MaskedMarth 16:58, October 19, 2006 (GMT)
That's fine, but why not credit Doraki for the translation? He DID do it and it WAS very nice of him. --Simna ibn Sind 18:55, October 19, 2006 (GMT)
- It was extremely nice of him to translate, but I don't think it's appropriate to credit him in the article, any more than it is appropriate to include "thanks to MaskedMarth for writing the article" in previous tier lists. A Wiki isn't the place to attribute credit and thanks - by definition it's a place where everybody contributes, and the reward for their work is a better article.
- I feel a little bit guilty every time I take credit away from an article - xif and tobias from the wavedashing article, cunning from the Fox article - and I don't mean to at all detract from Doraki's hard work, but I feel that giving him credit within the article isn't the right approach to SmashWiki. --MaskedMarth 20:50, October 19, 2006 (GMT)
I think un update to this page would be in order. Specifically, the screenshots section, it's really out of date.. Not only does the never version of GE look different and better, but also, there are a lot more smashers on here now than what's in those old pics.
And Simna, do you think I should add on the MySpace GSC page (SSBC) at the bottom of the page as an external link? --DRGN 03:09, May 20, 2007 (GMT)
¿What about a Spanish version?
I'm a volunteer =) --Dyna 22:40, January 31, 2007 (GMT)
- Oh most definitely yes...if you can take the english page and translate the whole thing into Spanish then that would help loads.--Simna ibn Sind 23:43, January 31, 2007 (GMT)
Spanish version done. --Dyna 13:26, February 2, 2007 (GMT)
So I kinda rewrote everything...
Well, not everything, but the format has been cleaned up and altered slightly to make it less of an instruction manual than it was. I took the system requirements out and linked to them externally instead, too; it was a little much for a wiki. All the other noteworthy changes are mostly stylistic, I just hope they're acceptable. *thumbs up* -- Randall00 21:59, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
