User talk:Black Vulpine/Archive 2

current talk page

Archive

1. 1

NOTE: When commenting on my talk page, please keep in mind the following: When contacting me about a new topic, click 'new section' next to 'edit this page' at the top of this page. Alternately, you can start your post with ==Header==. In either case, please name your topic appropriately. For discussing placement and usage of Black Vulpine art, please use this talk page. When replying to posts, please remember to indent them correctly with a colon (:) at the start of each line. The first reply should be preceded by one colon, the second reply should be preceded by two, and so on. Keep your replies on topic and to the point. Remember to sign your comments with four tildes like this: ~~~~ Remember to make use of Show preview before clicking 'Save page'. After posting, remember to check back here, as I will only reply to you here. If you want to respond again, you can do so in the same thread. In the same vein, if I posted on your or another talk page, please reply to me there, not here.

Solid Snake

What?! That was so true. Just play Metal Gear Solid 5 and you'll know I'm right. Big Boss in the original Metal Gear is Venom Snake, and the ending reveals that. Skuchi037 (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2018 (EDT)

Edit: Okay, good. You realized that. My bad. Skuchi037 (talk) 23:33, 14 March 2018 (EDT)

SW:OWNERSHIP

Nowhere in the policy does it say that an edit summary must be included when removing personal information. Awesome Cardinal 2000 23:56, 20 March 2018 (EDT)

Not a policy but Help:Edit summary suggests leaving edit summaries for removal of information, and I would tend to agree. Serpent  King 00:05, 21 March 2018 (EDT)

Yeah, turns out I had the wrong article. But even so, leaving edit summaries, no matter the circumstances, is something we actively enforce as if it is a policy, and that's what I was doing. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 00:09, 21 March 2018 (EDT)

It suggests it but does not say "must," and it does not say to revert a player's removal of their real name if they request to. And regardless of what the policy says, can't we at least respect the desires of players to hide their personal info? The player has already attempted to remove the name multiple times. Consider that there are many people who play smash on a competitive level just for fun, and would rather not have their personal info posted on some site on the Internet. Awesome Cardinal 2000 00:14, 21 March 2018 (EDT)

I'm pretty sure SK will side with me on this one, and I understand your concerns, but given that we ALWAYS revert no-summary removals, I honestly don't think it would be fair for us to make an exception for this bloke, because he has inadequately disclosed his intentions. There are actually quite a lot of things in the Help guides that we enforce as a policy, and this is one of those things. If you think there should be a change, take it up with administration. My hands are tied. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 00:24, 21 March 2018 (EDT)

Well SW:OWNERSHIP doesn't say that you must revert it every single time it happens. And the player even left a deletion tag saying "this page was made about me and I would no longer like it to be available on the internet." Is that not a reasonable enough attempt at communication at least suggesting that at least their real name should be removed? Awesome Cardinal 2000 00:32, 21 March 2018 (EDT)

I'll discuss it on Discord and see what we say. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 00:42, 21 March 2018 (EDT)