Template talk:SSB4Tiers

Can we find a less messily wide layout for this? I was thinking a 13-column layout would be a good layout for the first few tiers, but it's messier for the lower tiers... Miles (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2017 (EST)

17 wide, Parentheses equal fillers

S and A: (2) + 4 + (1) + 8 + (2)

B: (3) + 11 + (3)

C: (3) + 11 + (3)

D and E: 6 + 11

F: (5) + 7 + (5)

Try that? Miles (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2017 (EST)

Funny, that's the same layout I had in mind. I just didn't know how to put it in. Aidan, the Wandering Dragon Warrior 23:34, 1 March 2017 (EST)

Sounds good in theory. Let's see what it looks like. Serpent King 23:36, 1 March 2017 (EST)

[1] Serpent King 23:59, 1 March 2017 (EST)

I am unsure. Idk about anyone else, but I think it looks a little awkward. Not sure if there is any avoiding that though. Serpent King 00:03, 2 March 2017 (EST)

It is a little awkward, but I don't see a better approach at the moment. The large size of the B, C, and E tiers sets a hard minimum of 11 wide, and >20 is definitely undesirably wide. This'll work. Miles (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2017 (EST)

Ties

The SmashBoards article for the fourth tier list says:

"For the sake of placement differences between lists, we have given tied spots to characters whose average scores differed by less than 0.1."

This template needs to be changed to match the tier list. -- Ethan(Discussion) 20:59, 11 December 2017 (EST)

Feel free. Serpent King 21:01, 11 December 2017 (EST)

I'm fairly sure they only meant for those "ties" to matter when comparing placement differences between tier lists, not for rankings in the actual list itself. Otherwise it would have been made more evident that ties existed. Toomai Glittershine The Brazen 21:42, 11 December 2017 (EST)