Talk:Tree-grabbing

Deletion

Support per the tag. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 00:33, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

Neutral towards Oppose. This is more like asking this page to be deleted without actual reasons why it is not needed (which happened to other page (anti planking)). Several other techniques, even if it is not popular is still worth mentioning with proof. Plus whoever tagged the deletion, has to consider if this could be merged or not, which I'm unsure of. Luigi540 (talk) 00:45, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

I change to Oppose since this would not be merged that good. If I recall, I created this article few years ago after I found that technique on a video that is coined by other smashers. Luigi540 (talk) 07:40, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

Light Oppose I'm not a Melee player but I recognised this technique before even playing the video. The article may not be great, but it's a legitimate technique which will have one or two links to it on the wiki. #Toast ltimatum 04:49, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

Oppose Significant technique, and thought the article is short, there isn't really anything it can be merged too without making things a little awkward. Serpent King 07:19, 7 August 2016 (EDT)

Oppose The video has a lot of views, ever more than each videos of the SmashWiki Channel, so it's a pretty popular technique. It's needed. There is no reason why it's not. Anto99 (talk) 13:45, 7 August 2016 (EDT) Oppose Even though I added the tag, i was just unfamiliar with the name, i just called something different, so i thought it was not notable Poultry(talk) the God-Slayer 08:48, 7 August 2016 (EDT)