[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Forum:Competitive smash (SSB4)
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
I like how Nintendo is acknowledging the competitive scene for SSB4. Even if the E3 tournament is far from a common competitive ruleset, it's a good start at the very least. I was personally hoping it would be a 1v1 for all matches with no items for any of them and being able to choose any character, but I suppose it can't help because it would be a take long time if I'm not mistaken. I had been interested with competitive for a while. I wanted to start in Brawl, but lost interested after seeing how defensive it is thanks to game mechanics and Melee would take years for me to train. With SSB4, I think it would be a fresh start. Magiciandude (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2014 (EDT)
- I appreciate that they're trying to strike a more reasonable middle ground between competitive players and those who aren't interested in competitive play. Really fits the game into the general Nintendo strategy of trying to broaden appeal rather than narrow it. Miles (talk) 22:25, 29 May 2014 (EDT)
