Talk:Double jump
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
do we really need speculation on how characters double jump? we dont have an article on how kirby holds items without having fingers. --The Anonymous--
Read. Confirmed is not equal to speculation. Think about it; do we really need IPs with an IQ equivalent in number to my fingers sharing their half-brained opinions? Semicolon (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- ips have feelings too. and this ip has been a member on other wikis, and knows a little bit about harassment. im asking you nicely to leave me alone, please. --The Anonymous--
- if you make an account, then he wont bother you. JtM =^] (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- prejudice strikes at unexpected moments i suppose --The Anonymous--
- Nothing prejudiced about it. I made an edit. You reverted it. Your revert was ill advised. I then judged you. It's not because you're an IP that I found your edit silly, it's because the edit was silly and that I judged you. You can become a valued user on this wiki as an IP. But what was I supposed to refer to you as, a user? That you may be, but a user is a term with semantic complications generally referring to those who have user pages and screen names. You're obviously a person, but to make such a distinction is foolish. The most salient detail was that you operate as an IP. Thus, that is what I called you. Semicolon (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- prejudice=prejudge. meaning u "prejudged" me by calling me dumb.--The Anonymous--
- Nothing prejudiced about it. I made an edit. You reverted it. Your revert was ill advised. I then judged you. It's not because you're an IP that I found your edit silly, it's because the edit was silly and that I judged you. You can become a valued user on this wiki as an IP. But what was I supposed to refer to you as, a user? That you may be, but a user is a term with semantic complications generally referring to those who have user pages and screen names. You're obviously a person, but to make such a distinction is foolish. The most salient detail was that you operate as an IP. Thus, that is what I called you. Semicolon (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- prejudice strikes at unexpected moments i suppose --The Anonymous--
- if you make an account, then he wont bother you. JtM =^] (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
What's the point of just using IP anyway? Cheezperson {talk}stuff 04:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- it's a crime to humanity. o i thought u said "what's wrong" --The Anonymous--
- Ugh. No. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. Semicolon (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- that doesn't mean you can call people you dont even know a thing about idiots. --The Anonymous--
- Ugh. No. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. Semicolon (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
