[dismiss]
Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
Notices |
---|
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Template talk:SSBBCharacters
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
I can't say I'm confortable with having Sheik and Ganondorf in the template already; the interview stated how their character designs were submitted to Sakurai for Brawl, but does that mean he actually used them? :D Obviously it's likely they'll be in there, so the existence of their separate articles are just fine, but if we haven't seen any images of them yet I would support holding off on putting them in the template itself until they are seen, and just rely on the categories. Erik the Appreciator 15:39, August 3, 2007 (EDT)
- Well the way I see it, you are right. But at the same time, Sakurai wouldn't make character designs if they aren't going to be in Brawl. Until someone, or Sakurai himself, denies Eiji's statement, it's almost official. But at the same time, it isn't said if those two will be playable, AT, or just background characters. I'll admit, I was too hasty to put an article on those two. I disagree, however, on the images part. If Sonic was confirmed by Miyamoto today, does that mean that it's not official until there's an image of him? On the contrary, I shouldn't have added those articles without discussions, I'll apologize for that. Remove them from the templates, but for the articles, I don't know just yet. Magiciandude 16:42, August 3, 2007 (EDT)