User talk:162.233.176.177
This revert
I noticed you repeated an edit that was already reverted, and not only that, you reverted me (and Miles before me) without even providing an edit summary. Couple of things to keep note of here:
- Do not revert an edit that was already reverted, discuss any grievances on the associated article's talk page.
- If an edit was made in clear good faith (obviously mine was), DO NOT revert it without an edit summary; such an action may be seen as either vandalism, a personal attack or an assumption of bad faith, all of which are a big no-no here.
Black Vulpine of the 🦊Furry Nation🐺. Furries make the internets go! :3 23:35, June 8, 2021 (EDT)
Hi, listen to the above and do not repeatedly undo edits reverting yours, bring it to the talk page next time if you really think your wording was that much better. If you try reverting people again over that edit, you'll get blocked for longer. Omega Tyrant 
00:16, June 9, 2021 (EDT)
- There was no warning whatsoever, this is proof of an abuse of moderation with this block. 162.233.176.177 15:57, June 9, 2021 (EDT)
Yeah it makes it clear, the fact that the abuse of moderation powers here is quite clear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.233.176.177 (talk • contribs) 07:12, June 10, 2021 (EDT)
oh you two just love to single me out as always don't you?
|
This is an IP's talk page. While it's not a requirement to have a username, those that do not can only be recognized by their IP address, which can change over time and/or be assigned to an unrelated user; they can even be shared by multiple users. If this talk page belongs to your IP but its comments are intended for someone else, you may want to login or create an account to eliminate future confusion. |
