User talk:JiffyD

Hi there!

Welcome!

Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your contributions! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.

Read this first as it provides many great resources designed to help users get oriented with the wiki and become part of the community.

Visit the recent changes to see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.

Questions? You can ask at the help desk or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!

Need help? The community portal has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit.

I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you!

Disaster Flare (talk) 10:24, 17 April 2017 (EDT)

Oh thanks JiffyD (talk) 18:39, 17 April 2017 (EDT)

ENOUGH

Whether you think you are right or not, you DON'T have the right to do whatever you want. A consensus was reached when you 'discussed' the issue before, to make further edits now, as well as REPEATEDLY violate the Only Revert Once rule, you're only going to get yourself blocked from the wiki. Do I make myself clear? Black Vulpine (talk) 10:25, 18 April 2017 (EDT)

Get over yourself and think about what is actually correct. It seems like you ego is having a problem or something because changes I have made have been correct. Serpent pointed out a particular thing in something I put onto a page to let me know if was a bit misleading, so I fixed it. You are going around reverting what I'm doing in multiple places despite them BEING CORRECT. Its fine if its a matter of changing how the same info is presented(like the way you edited my edit on Absorption), but when I make an edit on something where the info is blatantly wrong (like Ness (SSBM)) and then you change it back to being wrong again then YOU ARE THE PROBLEM. And as for the so-called "consensus," I was not any part of that and if the info is incorrect I don't care who came to what consensus. If you don't want discussions like that ones we've had showing up on talk pages and history pages then I highly recommend you include me in you consensus-reaching because you are clearly missing some information....either that or you actually want the info to be incorrect. JiffyD (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2017 (EDT)

Edit warring is NOT the way to go about it! If you think I'm in the wrong, then you know what? Tell it to the admins. I'm already talking to them now on Discord. We'll see whom they side with. Given Serpent already agrees with me on a lot of these issues, so far it's not looking good for you. It doesn't matter how much you believe your info is right or not, that doesn't give you the right to do whatever the hell you want. If you can't get to grips with that, you don't belong on this wiki. Black Vulpine (talk) 10:38, 18 April 2017 (EDT)

You are edit warring as much IF NOT MORE than I am. Just because you have a fast track of communication to the admins DOES NOT mean you get to play the part of an admin yourself. How about if you have a problem with something I change YOU tell an admin and let them deal with me because they, at least, seem to have some amount of concern with what is correct game-wise. JiffyD (talk) 10:44, 18 April 2017 (EDT)