Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
Notices |
---|
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Talk:Pyrosphere: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==FG II-Grahams, Joulions, and Zeros are hazards== | ==FG II-Grahams, Joulions, and Zeros are hazards== | ||
This makes no sense. FG II-Grahams, Joulions, and Zeros are all hazards. FG II-Grahams can shoot at fighters, Joulions can explode when hit by a fighter, and Zeros are stage-exclusive Items. But why don't they have their own articles? [[User:The amazing owen|The amazing owen]] ([[User talk:The amazing owen|talk]]) 18:11, 8 July 2016 (EDT) | This makes no sense. FG II-Grahams, Joulions, and Zeros are all hazards. FG II-Grahams can shoot at fighters and can be destroyed by fighters, Joulions can explode when hit by a fighter, and Zeros are stage-exclusive Items. But why don't they have their own articles? Seriously, it makes no sense. [[User:The amazing owen|The amazing owen]] ([[User talk:The amazing owen|talk]]) 18:11, 8 July 2016 (EDT) |
Revision as of 19:31, July 8, 2016
As a Metroid expert and someone who has beaten Other M more times than he can count, I can tell you this looks like it's been upped in detail from the Other M version. RoyboyX Talk 18:44, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
- ...and? That's not really surprising considering Wii -> Wii U. Miles (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
- Well, in case it's notable. I dunno. Making a relevant observation. RoyboyX Talk 23:16, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
- I think it's pretty much a given that such improvements in detail will often take place across multiple consoles like that. Temple vs. Zelda II, Corneria vs. Star Fox 64, Green Hill Zone vs. Sonic 1, etc. In this case, I wouldn't say it's notable enough to talk about. Miles (talk) 23:36, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
- Well, in case it's notable. I dunno. Making a relevant observation. RoyboyX Talk 23:16, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
- Hold on, I don't think we can take just RoyboyX's word for it. Let me call me friend who is an expert on Metroids. ... Joking aside, if the stage is mostly ported from Other M (like Skyloft seems to be) then I don't think there's any harm in at least mentioning that Pyrosphere has been graphically touched up for SSSB4 if it's true.Quilt (talk) 00:52, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
About the speculation thing
The speculation part under overview addresses Sakurai's post. The speculation part in the trivia addresses Ridley's appearance as a stage hazard in the Dead or Alive universe. Two different things unless my interpretation is off. MegaTron1XD 22:01, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
- The issue isn't about speculation, it's about not making thing repetitive. There's a section under SW:TRIVIA about repetition. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
Tail?
When? RoyboyX Talk 20:18, 13 May 2014 (EDT)
- When Ridley's shadow appears in the Direct, what appears to be part of his tail briefly hangs down in the foreground of the shot for a few frames. Miles (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2014 (EDT)
FG II-Grahams, Joulions, and Zeros are hazards
This makes no sense. FG II-Grahams, Joulions, and Zeros are all hazards. FG II-Grahams can shoot at fighters and can be destroyed by fighters, Joulions can explode when hit by a fighter, and Zeros are stage-exclusive Items. But why don't they have their own articles? Seriously, it makes no sense. The amazing owen (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2016 (EDT)