Talk:Corrin: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


Also keep in mind that [[Villager|any]] [[Robin|avatar]] [[Link|character]] could indeed be of a different sexuality, as they are a representation of the player, and if a homosexual person were to play the game that character would in turn be the same. The option to pursue such a relationship is not typically included, but it's still a fact (and Animal Crossing and Zelda don't even allow heterosexual relationships, so) <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="red">SANTY</font> <font color="green">CLAWS</font>]]! Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  12:52, 17 December 2015 (EST)
Also keep in mind that [[Villager|any]] [[Robin|avatar]] [[Link|character]] could indeed be of a different sexuality, as they are a representation of the player, and if a homosexual person were to play the game that character would in turn be the same. The option to pursue such a relationship is not typically included, but it's still a fact (and Animal Crossing and Zelda don't even allow heterosexual relationships, so) <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="red">SANTY</font> <font color="green">CLAWS</font>]]! Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  12:52, 17 December 2015 (EST)
:Per DNK. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:#090">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: #f00;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 12:55, 17 December 2015 (EST)

Revision as of 12:55, December 17, 2015

shouldn't we list Corrin as a lgbt character in the trivia? 172.56.15.196
We could, but given that it's a rather minor gameplay choice that isn't necessarily going to happen, and it's not really all that notable anyway, I would say no. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 10:08, 17 December 2015 (EST)
1. That's kinda unrelated to Smash Bros. 2. It's a rather minor gameplay choice, ans DatNuttyKid said. also, sign your comments with four tildes (~), not three tildes (~). INoMedssig.png INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 10:10, 17 December 2015 (EST)
there's plenty of articles making a big deal about it, so I really wouldn't call it minor. 172.56.15.196 11:57, 17 December 2015 (EST)
Name one. AidanzapunkChristmasSig.pngAidan, the Jolly Space WarriorAidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png 11:58, 17 December 2015 (EST)
http://www.digitaltrends.com/gaming/fire-emblem-same-sex-marriage/ 172.56.15.196 12:02, 17 December 2015 (EST)
Either way, being gay is not related to Smash Bros in any way. We document Smash Bros, not LGBT trash! No offense, but your excuses are awkward. INoMedssig.png INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 12:11, 17 December 2015 (EST)
it's a first for the series, I think it deserves to be mentioned. It's in no way "trash". 172.56.15.196 12:33, 17 December 2015 (EST)

(Reset indent)

  1. I was referring to an article here, as I thought you meant the same.
  2. It doesn't really matter, it's not something that goes in the trivia of a page like this.
  3. INoMed, I take offense to that statement.

AidanzapunkChristmasSig.pngAidan, the Jolly Space WarriorAidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png 12:38, 17 December 2015 (EST)

A character's sexuality in their home game is irrelevant to their Smash appearance. Thus, I don't think it should be included. Berrenta (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2015 (EST)
Just what I was going to say. Either way, we don't need the trivia. DekZek, The Festive Fighter Dekzeksig-Dec.png 12:45, 17 December 2015 (EST)

Before this escalates, and since the point on Bayonetta being the first third-party female character is allowed to stand, I propose that we wait until the DLC comes out and see if either avatar is clearly portrayed as LGBT in Smash Bros. If they are, we can mention the point. If not, there is no need to mention the point at all. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 12:50, 17 December 2015 (EST)

Gender ≠ sexuality. Bayonetta being the first female third party character is important, but frankly, sexuality isn't. AidanzapunkChristmasSig.pngAidan, the Jolly Space WarriorAidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png 12:51, 17 December 2015 (EST)

I think it would be a little more notable if the character was definitely of a different sexuality, since that would be a first for the series. However, given that there's probably a large majority of players that would not have their avatar end up with the same-sex relationships (can't remember their names), and it's overall optional, I'd say it's pretty pointless.

Also keep in mind that any avatar character could indeed be of a different sexuality, as they are a representation of the player, and if a homosexual person were to play the game that character would in turn be the same. The option to pursue such a relationship is not typically included, but it's still a fact (and Animal Crossing and Zelda don't even allow heterosexual relationships, so) ---Preceding unsigned comment added by SANTY CLAWS! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 12:52, 17 December 2015 (EST)

Per DNK. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 12:55, 17 December 2015 (EST)