User talk:Drilly Dilly

Archive

1. 1

Starting a new talk page, people. Ask me stuff here.

SW:NPA

You're getting into personal attack territory with your behavior on Serpent King's talk page. I'd rather not phrase this as a warning, per se, so let me put it this way: I encourage you to reconsider how you interact with other users. Miles (talk) 04:03, 30 October 2015 (EDT)

I'm sorry. I just wish my edits would start getting appreciated more around here rather than continuously get changed in favor of those of someone else. Know what I mean? - Drilly the Hedgehog 18:12, 30 October 2015 (EDT)

xD

I actually thought your talk page was protected there xD INoMed ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 04:16, 30 October 2015 (EDT)

I'd like to advise you...

to stop harassing King and John. Yeah they disagree with your actions, but that's because they are violations of the basic guidelines. You used to be a be a user who would help out, but now you are trying too hard to be funny or too stuck with your side and calling any disagreements to your opinion hate and people who do disagree with you being accused of being jerks. What I'm trying to tell you is straighten your attitude. Ganonmew, The TERRIFYING Evil Clone 14:49, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

While it is respectable that you are trying to put a stop to it, Miles is already getting it under control. He's keeping a close eye out and making sure nothing else happens. I would recommend leaving it be for now unless something happens again. Disaster Flare (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

That's what I'll do. I'm not angry with Drilly as much as I am annoyed and surprised. Ganonmew, The TERRIFYING Evil Clone 15:05, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

Yeah, I get what you mean. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

(sigh) I feel very bad and guilty now. I'm just here for the same goal as almost everybody else: to make it better by filling the pages with valuable content. I never thought I would be ridiculed this much. - Drilly the Hedgehog 19:37, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

The intent is to offer advice, not to ridicule you. Good faith edits are appreciated, but part of the nature of a wiki is understanding that people will not always agree with you and sometimes your edits will be revised by others. Being able to take constructive criticism is an important skill. Miles (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

Still, I feel very bad. I understand you guys are giving me tips on how to behave around here and hope you're not mad at me. I'm still looking forward to improving this site. - Drilly the Hedgehog 19:44, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

I just want to say...

...that your last edit to the Roy page, while short, was good. There was no subjectivity and I think you worded it better than it was before. Also, nothing was awkwardly worded there were was no excessive use of semicolons (;), and no unnecessary or redundant info. I hope you realize I haven't been trying to "annoy" you by editing some of the stuff you've written. I'm just working on improving it. Some of the stuff I've written now will be edited and improved by someone else weeks or months from now. If you look at what exactly I'm changing when I make these edits, you'll see that I am trying to cut back on awkward wording, run-on sentences, and unnecessary or redundant info.

If you want to know what I consider to be unnecessary, here are some examples. On the Sonic page, there are two bits of unnecessary info imo. "...this includes his terrible range due to his small stature (in addition to a lack of projectiles and a sword)" - "terrible" is not a good word if we want to stay neutral. Also, not everyone without a sword has bad range, and it is quite clear that Sonic does not have a sword (except here, but that's not PM). Also, "As such, similar to the space animals, a single blunder from Sonic can cost him his stock." - this holds true for everyone. If you mess up Ness's recovery, you lose a stock. If a heavy character misses a smash attack, they could get zero-to-death K.O.ed. The space animals are not the only ones who have to worry about not making a single blunder.

Do you understand what I mean by awkward wording, run-on sentences, and unnecessary or redundant info? These are things that make the wiki less encyclopedic. You have to be careful that nothing you add is awkwardly worded, run-on, or extraneous. You've made good edits, but you need to be open to people improving on those edits. So please realize that I make these edits to improve the wiki, not to annoy you or just because I like my version of stuff more (and sometimes, my version is worse in some ways). Thank you. John PK SMAAAASH!! 08:20, 1 November 2015 (EST)

This. The Roy edit was indeed a remarkable start. Keep up the good work. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 11:50, 1 November 2015 (EST)

So now you're complimenting me? I've been making good edits prior, too, you know. - Drilly the Hedgehog 14:45, 1 November 2015 (EST)

Wow. Dude, chill out. It's a compliment, why are you taking offense to it? Serpent King 14:47, 1 November 2015 (EST)

I'm not saying I'm offended (why would anyone be offended by a compliment?). I'm only asking the 11-year-old kid why he's complimenting me now instead of before. - Drilly the Hedgehog 15:07, 1 November 2015 (EST)

Well I wasn't witness to it, and if it was before, then it was before the OT incident where you just fell apart. After two weeks of a rough time on the wiki, the Roy edit is a good place to clean up. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 17:02, 1 November 2015 (EST)

How were you not aware? You're active on this wiki every day when you're not at school. I make my edits after I come home. - Drilly the Hedgehog 18:23, 1 November 2015 (EST)

Well, you'd be surprised how much school consumes my life, and how much Recent Changes floods the wiki. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 19:16, 1 November 2015 (EST)

Now you tell me. - Drilly the Hedgehog 20:42, 1 November 2015 (EST)

I forgot to say, good job bud, you did a good job. I will admit I was worried at first that it was gonna get reverted again, but as soon as the compliments settled in, I relaxed a bit. Keep up the good work. :D Disaster Flare (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2015 (EST)

Weren't my previous edits good, also? - Drilly the Hedgehog 23:55, 1 November 2015 (EST)

Yes they were, but SW:TONE was getting in the way of making them 100% good. I still feel bad about the fact that you almost had to face punishment though. Disaster Flare (talk) 23:59, 1 November 2015 (EST)

I blame John. - Drilly the Hedgehog 01:49, 2 November 2015 (EST)

WOAH WOAH WOAH Nyargleblargle (Talk | Contribs) 19:17, 3 November 2015 (EST)

(reset) Pardon? - Drilly the Hedgehog 01:21, 4 November 2015 (EST)

Blaming other users for your potential punishment is a bit...worrying. Nyargleblargle (Talk | Contribs) 09:28, 4 November 2015 (EST)

Dang

You're fast. I keep trying to undo, but you and SC keep beating me to the punch. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 17:52, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Please let me... Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 17:57, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Go ahead. - Drilly the Hedgehog 17:57, 7 November 2015 (EST)

...Did I just steal yours Ganonmew? D: ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:57, 7 November 2015 (EST)

...yeah, you did. - Drilly the Hedgehog 17:58, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Take this one. Sowwy... ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:58, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Nvm, SC took it. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 17:59, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Sorry, that was very unsporting of me. ScoreCounter 18:00, 7 November 2015 (EST)

(reset) What are you waiting for? Go. - Drilly the Hedgehog 18:02, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Now I'm good till the next vandal. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 18:03, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Nvm, then. ScoreCounter, please continue. - Drilly the Hedgehog 18:04, 7 November 2015 (EST)

• Fire Emblem Level Up Jingle* ScoreCounter 18:04, 7 November 2015 (EST)

Roy

We have to get a compromise. What exactly do you dislike about my most recent edit? John PK SMAAAASH!! 21:24, 13 November 2015 (EST)

I concur. John's edit flows better. Serpent King 21:35, 13 November 2015 (EST)

Agreed. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 21:36, 13 November 2015 (EST)

Why do you guys antagonize me and my edits? Mind telling me how mine's bad? At least I'm partially following SW:TONE. - Drilly the Hedgehog 23:23, 13 November 2015 (EST)

I did not violate 1RV because the edit was discussed first. You, by choice, did not participate. You on the other hand, did violate 1RV. Serpent King 23:38, 13 November 2015 (EST)

I don't think it matters unless it was vandalism, in this case of which is was not, so you did. - Drilly the Hedgehog 23:40, 13 November 2015 (EST)

Have you actually read the policy? It says that the edit must be discussed before a decision was made. It was unanimous that John's edit was better. Serpent King 23:41, 13 November 2015 (EST)

Oh, also, the policy states that you should not revert an edit that breaks 1RV anyway sooooo... Serpent King 23:46, 13 November 2015 (EST)

(reset) See, this is why I absolutely envy you, Serpent. - Drilly the Hedgehog 23:59, 13 November 2015 (EST)

That may be the wrong word. Serpent King 00:01, 14 November 2015 (EST)

Just a note, given that it is a 3-1 scenario here, it's not really our job to tell you what's wrong with yours. It's your job to tell us why yours is better. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 00:01, 14 November 2015 (EST)

To Serpent: I assume you don't know the definition of 'envy'. - Drilly the Hedgehog 00:02, 14 November 2015 (EST)

Look, this conversation is pointless. Unless you want to argue your point on the edits, let's end it now. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 00:05, 14 November 2015 (EST)

Agree'd. Serpent King 00:05, 14 November 2015 (EST)

That's exactly what I want. Nonetheless, I still loathe Serpent. - Drilly the Hedgehog 00:06, 14 November 2015 (EST)

Mr. Serious 11 year old is back.

"I blame John." "I still loathe Serpent"

I'm tired, Drilly. They are trying to help the growth of the wiki and are helping you make better decisions with your edits. If all you're going to do is violate SW:1RV and SW:NPA to defend your points, you eat posts like mine. Please go back to the Drilly Dilly I remember. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 07:40, 14 November 2015 (EST)

You're seriously not helping. I too am trying to help this wiki and make it a better place and secure it from vandals by reverting their edits, but in return, what do I get: hatred and criticism. What's up with that? Just leave me alone, will ya? Sooner or later, things will probably start getting worse if we continue this discussion. Dropping out RIGHT NOW. - Drilly the Hedgehog 11:28, 14 November 2015 (EST)

I'm only trying to give you constructive criticism. I don't hate you, in fact I like you a lot. But please refrain from comments like the ones I made. I really hate making commenys like these and I hope this is the last one I have to make. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 07:50, 15 November 2015 (EST)

No admins are around, so ignore the vandal

Seriously, I've dealt with vandals before. Nothing gets them to go away quicker (aside from a ban) than ignoring them. Laikue (talk | contribs) 03:09, 16 November 2015 (EST)