SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Awesomelink234 (2): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Comments: Fracking category pages.) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
I would like to note that repeated RfAs in rapid succession, especially after your potential as an admin hasn't particularly improved, could be seen as [[SmashWiki:Blocking_guidelines#Block_reasons|disruptive behaviour]], something that is considered a blockable offense. If you are still interested in becoming an administrator, I'd recommend looking at what's on [ | I would like to note that repeated RfAs in rapid succession, especially after your potential as an admin hasn't particularly improved, could be seen as [[SmashWiki:Blocking_guidelines#Block_reasons|disruptive behaviour]], something that is considered a blockable offense. If you are still interested in becoming an administrator, I'd recommend looking at what's on [http://www.ssbwiki.com/Category:Accepted_RfAs this page] before trying again. | ||
--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 12:53, 2 August 2014 (EDT) | --- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 12:53, 2 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:54, August 2, 2014
Awesomelink234 (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)
Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
Here's my second admin request. I now have over 100 edits and 50 mainspace edits. I'd be on every day and love to help out. I never vandalized once, not counting that one time where I thought Green Hill Zone was not a returning stage in Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS until I was proven wrong by an admin. (I think it was Miles.) Awesomelink234 (talk) 12:37, 2 August 2014 (EDT)
Support
- ...
Oppose
- You haven't shown that you can do things that are necessary to being an admin on this wiki. Do you know all of the policies well? Do you handle debates professionally? 100 edits is barely anything, there are many active users who have much more edits but still aren't nearly ready to become admins (I have over 10,000 edits; more than 5,000 mainspace edits, yet I'm not even close to deserving adminship). Scr7
(talk · contribs) 12:42, 2 August 2014 (EDT) - You don't have enough experience. Still. And remember, editcount does not play that much of a huge role in adminship. Emmett was a bureaucrat, and he only had 137 edits. Most admins have been around for years before requesting, so you should probably wait. Qwerty (talk) 12:46, 2 August 2014 (EDT)
Neutral
- ...
Comments
I would like to note that repeated RfAs in rapid succession, especially after your potential as an admin hasn't particularly improved, could be seen as disruptive behaviour, something that is considered a blockable offense. If you are still interested in becoming an administrator, I'd recommend looking at what's on this page before trying again.
--- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 12:53, 2 August 2014 (EDT)
