Template talk:Events: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New Page: I'm gonna have to say that I '''oppose''' this one. It's too simplified; if I want to find an event on the template but don't remember its number, I have to slowly search along the link...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm gonna have to say that I '''oppose''' this one. It's too simplified; if I want to find an event on the template but don't remember its number, I have to slowly search along the links until I find the right one. There's no reason to remove the event titles, in my opinion. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 12:14, 25 May 2012 (EDT) | I'm gonna have to say that I '''oppose''' this one. It's too simplified; if I want to find an event on the template but don't remember its number, I have to slowly search along the links until I find the right one. There's no reason to remove the event titles, in my opinion. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 12:14, 25 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
:Yeah, this looks neater and more formal, but ultimetely, not many will know the order of the event matches by heart. It's like when people don't know TM numbers in Pokémon, they struggle to navigate Bulbapedia. Because of how much nicer it looks, I'm going to stay '''neutral''', but others may not be so Memphis. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 14:38, 25 May 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:38, May 25, 2012
I'm gonna have to say that I oppose this one. It's too simplified; if I want to find an event on the template but don't remember its number, I have to slowly search along the links until I find the right one. There's no reason to remove the event titles, in my opinion. Miles (talk) 12:14, 25 May 2012 (EDT)
- Yeah, this looks neater and more formal, but ultimetely, not many will know the order of the event matches by heart. It's like when people don't know TM numbers in Pokémon, they struggle to navigate Bulbapedia. Because of how much nicer it looks, I'm going to stay neutral, but others may not be so Memphis. Toast
ltimatum
14:38, 25 May 2012 (EDT)
