User talk:Mr. Curious

Your username seems suspicious. Like it was from wikia. Just saying. ..... The Overmind 09:13, 31 January 2012 (EST)

He is from Wikia... BlindColours 10:11, 31 January 2012 (EST)

While we are permitted to be dubious, SmashWiki:Assume good faith still applies. Toast ltimatum 11:27, 31 January 2012 (EST)

SW:SIGN

Remember to sign your comments using four ~s. Also, I do not care what your actions were in wikia, so long as you are a good user here. As such, welcome to SmashWiki! Mr. Anontalk 19:01, 31 January 2012 (EST)

Your block

You have been blocked for repeatedly violating SW:TALK and SW:SIGN. Talk pages are not to be used to talk with users about off-Wiki matters. And whenever you post, you sign your comment.

I decided to be lenient this one time. However, after your block is over, if you continue to show no desire to help the Wiki, and keep disregarding its policies and community, you will be permabanned. Omega Tyrant 20:02, 3 February 2012 (EST)

Sorry. My mistake. I will try to remember to sign comments. Now you should unblock me. I realised my mistake. Mr. Curious (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2012 (EST)

It doesn't work that way, and the signatures isn't the only issue. Omega Tyrant 22:47, 3 February 2012 (EST)

Your problem wasn't only that you failed to follow sig policy. It was that you failed to follow sig policy, and that you continued to violate the policy after I had warned you. Furthermore, you have been harassing some users on their talk pages, even after they asked you to stop. You did not appear to show signs of improvement, so Omega Tyrant blocked you. Once the block ends, you can try and prove yourself, but this is the punishment for ignoring warnings. Mr. Anontalk 23:38, 3 February 2012 (EST)

Congratulations, you've stocked up on yet another offense: impersonation. Your block has been extended a week. And before you try to say I can't prove that IP address was you, here's the facts: the IP is clearly similar to some of your previous IPs. Not to mention your username appeared in the Who's Online list the instant I blocked the IP, which pretty much confirmed it. Toomai Glittershine The Irrepressible 22:03, 4 February 2012 (EST)

Ip Addresses are ot sockpuppets. Change the block settings back now, only those who make the block have the right to control the length. I did no such thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.242.37 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 5 February 2012

"Ip Addresses are ot sockpuppets."

In this case, yes, they are.

"Change the block settings back now"

You are in no position to bargain.

"only those who make the block have the right to control the length"

Toomai is of higher rank than OT, so yes, he does have the right.

"I did no such thing."

Yes, you did. --- ReiDemon, Author Extraordinaire, 01:01, 5 February 2012 (EST)

"only those who make the block have the right to control the length"

Toomai is of higher rank than OT, so yes, he does have the right.

False, there is no "rank", and any mod can adjust the ban length of a banned user, regardless of which mod made the original ban. Omega Tyrant 01:28, 5 February 2012 (EST)

Rank was a terrible word to use, but I can't think of another word for it; I was referring to the fact that Toomai has the b'crat powers, whilst you have only admin. But still, I suppose the point still stands... --- ReiDemon, Author Extraordinaire, 01:34, 5 February 2012 (EST)