Talk:Event 14: Sproutrage of the Flower Pikmin: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(and btw, the waddle hacking thing is not as much speculation as the origin thing) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::::Explain. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 14:32, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | ::::::Explain. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 14:32, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::::::Having too many links causes the reader to be distracted. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REPEATLINK#Repeated_links if the first link in an infobox (like this scenario), it's fine], but don't use too many repeated links. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 14:37, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | :::::::Having too many links causes the reader to be distracted. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REPEATLINK#Repeated_links if the first link in an infobox (like this scenario), it's fine], but don't use too many repeated links. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 14:37, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Whenever possible would mean that it should be used so long as it doesn't repeat itself after infobox usage. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 14:39, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:39, May 14, 2011
Double linking
In case you haven't noticed, many articles link again if it is only in the infobox. MegaTron1XD
14:10, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- Doesn't mean those articles have the "correct" style. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- It's generally agreed that it is ok to have a double link like so. Unless you plan on suggesting that all double links be removed, avoid removing double links. MegaTron1XD
14:21, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- OK then. But I still don't see why they are necessary. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:22, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- Links should be used whenever possible to make the Wiki more "connected". MegaTron1XD 14:23, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- I disagree. Linking everything possible makes articles more cluttered. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- Links should be used whenever possible to make the Wiki more "connected". MegaTron1XD
- OK then. But I still don't see why they are necessary. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:22, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- It's generally agreed that it is ok to have a double link like so. Unless you plan on suggesting that all double links be removed, avoid removing double links. MegaTron1XD
