User talk:Megatron1/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

→‎Queen Zelda: new section
No edit summary
(→‎Queen Zelda: new section)
Line 75: Line 75:
Is there a voting for the featured article open to the public? [[User:Tailed Fox|Tailed Fox]] ([[User talk:Tailed Fox|talk]]) 19:07, 19 January 2011 (EST)
Is there a voting for the featured article open to the public? [[User:Tailed Fox|Tailed Fox]] ([[User talk:Tailed Fox|talk]]) 19:07, 19 January 2011 (EST)
:[[SW:FA|Go here]].<span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 20:42, 19 January 2011 (EST)
:[[SW:FA|Go here]].<span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 20:42, 19 January 2011 (EST)
== Queen Zelda ==
As someone who finished Twilight Princess, the anon's edit on Zelda (SSBB) seems just about okay to me - she's the ruler, and so ''de facto'' queen given that Hyrule's a kingdom not a principality. The only slightly dodgy spot is the "coronation prevented by the events of the game" - quite probable, but inferred rather than shown or stated, IIRC.
On a related note, edit summaries talking about unrelated pages are fine on Recent Changes, but when you're looking through page histories later on (as I was yesterday), they're helleva confusing... - [[User:Reboot|Reboot]] ([[User talk:Reboot|talk]]) 01:20, 21 January 2011 (EST)
4,255

edits