User talk:Clarinet Hawk/Archive 8: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) (→irc) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
::Can you perma-ban BNK please?? [[User:N33B|N33B]] ([[User talk:N33B|talk]]) 16:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | ::Can you perma-ban BNK please?? [[User:N33B|N33B]] ([[User talk:N33B|talk]]) 16:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::No, unless you can provide me a very convincing argument. (This is technically just my own personal decision, but I would hope that the other admins would abide by it unless you at least consult with me first.) --<span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadowcrest</span>]]</span> 18:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | :::No, unless you can provide me a very convincing argument. (This is technically just my own personal decision, but I would hope that the other admins would abide by it unless you at least consult with me first.) --<span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadowcrest</span>]]</span> 18:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Biased for Jigglypuff? == | |||
Hi. I have looked at [[Special:Contributions/Phayz|this user's contributions]], and maybe it's because I absoultely HATE Jigglypuff, but it seems to me that he/she is biased for Jigglypuff. I wouldn't call him/her a vandal (that's why I didn't put this on the vandal section) because he/she doesn't replace articles with "GAY GAY GAY" or anything like that, but I do think this user needs a warning or something like that to quit making Jiggly seem like the best character ever no matter what it takes. However, he/she may just be a normal user. I can't tell because I'm biased against [[Jigglypuff|YOU FAIL!]]. That's why I wanted a second opinion. [[User:Enigmatic Mr. L|Enigmatic Mr. L]] ([[User talk:Enigmatic Mr. L|talk]]) 00:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |