SmashWiki talk:Notability/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Line 58: Line 58:
:::No, but things like character mains are hard to tell. Also, some people may be entirely made up. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 00:41, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
:::No, but things like character mains are hard to tell. Also, some people may be entirely made up. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 00:41, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
::::That's really cool and all, but protection would solve absolutely nothing. If you wish to propose a change to the entire smasher namespace, you are welcome to do that instead, but this proposal is not a solution to the problems you're presenting. <span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadowcrest</span>]]</span> 20:07, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
::::That's really cool and all, but protection would solve absolutely nothing. If you wish to propose a change to the entire smasher namespace, you are welcome to do that instead, but this proposal is not a solution to the problems you're presenting. <span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadowcrest</span>]]</span> 20:07, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
:::::I honestly think it would be near impossible to win a libel suit against SmashWiki.  One, we're not a published document.  Two, proving that we intentionally misrepresented someone would be virtually impossible (even if we ever did such a thing, which I can't say I have seen).  Three, I don't think any of this information could be damaging enough to cause any form of restitution to be ordered even if the case was won.  Libel isn't a concern of ours.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 23:02, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
3,882

edits