Talk:Dash attack canceled up smash: Difference between revisions
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
NOOO!!! thats the prob!!! no- one is settling on the name. merge it first. then we can see which one the community decides. also, boost-smashing came first thats the name which should be official, DACUS can be A technical one, sure, but how can a brand-new article(DACUS) be "official?" --[[User:Tarrant1400|tarrant1400]] ([[User talk:Tarrant1400|talk]]) 08:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | NOOO!!! thats the prob!!! no- one is settling on the name. merge it first. then we can see which one the community decides. also, boost-smashing came first thats the name which should be official, DACUS can be A technical one, sure, but how can a brand-new article(DACUS) be "official?" --[[User:Tarrant1400|tarrant1400]] ([[User talk:Tarrant1400|talk]]) 08:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
[[Smashboards]] calls it DACUS, so I assume it is the most common name used for this technique.[[User:Y462|Y462]] <small>([[User talk:Y462|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Y462|C]] • [[Special:Editcount/Y462|E]] )</small> 19:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:40, January 2, 2009
MERGE!!!
how many names will we have for this technique: canceled dash attack into a sliding up samsh. plz someone put them all together. and prevent new ones from being made!--tarrant1400 (talk) 07:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
DACUS is the official name, so this one stays I guess. Shade487z/SeniorSombra! 07:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
NOOO!!! thats the prob!!! no- one is settling on the name. merge it first. then we can see which one the community decides. also, boost-smashing came first thats the name which should be official, DACUS can be A technical one, sure, but how can a brand-new article(DACUS) be "official?" --tarrant1400 (talk) 08:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Smashboards calls it DACUS, so I assume it is the most common name used for this technique.Y462 (T • C • E ) 19:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)