SmashWiki talk:You are valuable: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→guideline: what is there?) |
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Are guidelines enforcable? If not, this should stay a policy. --<span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadow</span>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4;">crest</span>]]</span> 01:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | :Are guidelines enforcable? If not, this should stay a policy. --<span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadow</span>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4;">crest</span>]]</span> 01:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::What is there to enforce, except to check the god-king administrators? --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 01:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ::What is there to enforce, except to check the god-king administrators? --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 01:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::This is less of covering the "tin plated dictators with delusions of godhood" than it is empowering the normal users. I want to be able to call people out for a) putting sysops/etc on pedestals; b) overstepping their bounds as <x> by throwing their rank around improperly; and/or c) belittling themselves on basis or "rank". | |||
:::<small>Why the dictators comment is funny. ([http://guildwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:OBloodyHell&diff=prev&oldid=1440418 1])</small> --<span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadow</span>]][[User talk:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4;">crest</span>]]</span> 01:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:42, January 30, 2009
Sounds good to me. But maybe mention that admins do usually have the final say in things? BALτʀο [ talk ] 05:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
guideline
It is decidedly a behavioral guideline; how people should act, rather than it is necessary they act. If the peons (so to speak) want to behave as peons, that's their prerogative, and we shouldn't force them to behave otherwise, only note that they are allowed to behave otherwise. --Sky (t · c · w) 00:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Are guidelines enforcable? If not, this should stay a policy. --Shadowcrest 01:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- What is there to enforce, except to check the god-king administrators? --Sky (t · c · w) 01:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is less of covering the "tin plated dictators with delusions of godhood" than it is empowering the normal users. I want to be able to call people out for a) putting sysops/etc on pedestals; b) overstepping their bounds as <x> by throwing their rank around improperly; and/or c) belittling themselves on basis or "rank".
- Why the dictators comment is funny. (1) --Shadowcrest 01:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- What is there to enforce, except to check the god-king administrators? --Sky (t · c · w) 01:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
