Talk:Green Koopa Shell: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''STRONG MERGE''' I agree with Megatron.-[[User:Ivy73|Ivy73]] ([[User talk:Ivy73|talk]]) 14:12, June 5, 2010 (UTC) | '''STRONG MERGE''' I agree with Megatron.-[[User:Ivy73|Ivy73]] ([[User talk:Ivy73|talk]]) 14:12, June 5, 2010 (UTC) | ||
This article should be merged with Green Shell instead of by itself. [[User:Chimanruler15|Chimanruler15]] ([[User talk:Chimanruler15|talk]]) 14:10, June 5, 2010 (UTC) | This article should be merged with Green Shell instead of by itself. [[User:Chimanruler15|Chimanruler15]] ([[User talk:Chimanruler15|talk]]) 14:10, June 5, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:14, June 5, 2010
STRONG MERGE I am tired of seeing pointless pages that are basically the exact same thing as another article. Koopa Claus Happy Holidays 00:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Merge. At most, all that's required is a simple note on the Green Shell page making the distinction. Since all Green Koopa Shells are inherently Green Shells (not to mention that they behave identically) there's really no reason to have this page. – Defiant Elements +talk 00:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
STRONG MERGE I don't even know what that means, but I'm fairly certain that "I concur" would be a comment wholly suited to this situation. PenguinofDeath (talk) 11:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC) STRONG MERGE This could be a sub section in the shell article.--Megatron1 (talk) 13:53, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
STRONG MERGE I agree with Megatron.-Ivy73 (talk) 14:12, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
This article should be merged with Green Shell instead of by itself. Chimanruler15 (talk) 14:10, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
