SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 18:42, August 21, 2008
, 16 years ago→New Idea for All Sysops
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
::<small> edit conflict </small> Do I really need to explain why "How about no." is not a legitimate reason to oppose something which, for all intents and purposes, would solve all of the wikidrama outright? The worst possible outcome would be that the drama would end and the sysops' positions would be strengthened. Think about it Semicolon, if y'all reconfirmed the Sysops, you'd get your wish, I'd leave. – [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] 22:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ::<small> edit conflict </small> Do I really need to explain why "How about no." is not a legitimate reason to oppose something which, for all intents and purposes, would solve all of the wikidrama outright? The worst possible outcome would be that the drama would end and the sysops' positions would be strengthened. Think about it Semicolon, if y'all reconfirmed the Sysops, you'd get your wish, I'd leave. – [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] 22:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Nice strawman, ace. How about, 'How about no' was my answer, and 'it's not necessary' was my reasoning? [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | :::Nice strawman, ace. How about, 'How about no' was my answer, and 'it's not necessary' was my reasoning? [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::Nice threat, genius. On this wiki, from what I've heard you should be banned for that, OMGZ. How about, "How about yes" was my answer, and "You're a stubborn, narrow-minded dipshit" was my reasoning? —[[User:Warwick|Warwick]] 22:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | |||