Talk:Up throw Rest: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Fix'd grammar) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''No Delete''' I've seen the term used a lot on SWF and GFAQs, and it still works; DI just makes it slightly harder. Then again, what ''doesn't'' DI make harder? [[User:BurningCrusader777|NeonCrusader]] 23:01, November 20, 2007 (EST) | '''No Delete''' I've seen the term used a lot on SWF and GFAQs, and it still works; DI just makes it slightly harder. Then again, what ''doesn't'' DI make harder? [[User:BurningCrusader777|NeonCrusader]] 23:01, November 20, 2007 (EST) | ||
::No, RJM I was refering to teamrocketspy621, he changed his opinion whe you gave yours. --[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 13:33, November 22, 2007 (EST) | ::No, RJM I was refering to teamrocketspy621, he changed his opinion whe you gave yours. --[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 13:33, November 22, 2007 (EST) | ||
:::I changed my opinion because Zinnamon wanted to delete an article on what could be a valid tactic when his technique articles aren't exactly useful. Lightshielding, using Z for aerials, and One-hit KOs weren't exactly made/discovered/named by Zinnamon. However, Zinnamon and RJM may be right; the Space Animal Slayer might not exist. ''That'' is why I changed my opinion; because Randall > Me. [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 15:18, November 22, 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:18, November 22, 2007
Delete can some one confirm de validity of this technique??
- No Delete Can someone confirm the validity of the "Deathly Combo," "Z-Aerial," and "Z-Barrier?" I'm afraid that you can't delete real technique pages when your own are not correct. Teamrocketspy621 12:14, November 20, 2007 (EST)
This is a well-known technique among Jigglypuff players. No delete.--nealdt 12:50, November 20, 2007 (EST)
Delete - I've never heard this terminology before and I don't see how "up-throw to rest" doesn't just get mentioned offhandedly in the Jigglypuff article. Really, how much can you say about this tactic? Enough for an article? I doubt it. --RJM Talk 16:12, November 20, 2007 (EST)
- Hmmm... you're right. I've never heard of it before I found this article, but heck, it sounds as valid as the Wall of Pain to me. But what do I know? XD Teamrocketspy621 16:33, November 20, 2007 (EST)
- MMMM maybe you said that because zinnamon say that it was wrong, and because he has been wrong before you thought you will be right if you say the opposite than him. I'm right? (Zinnamon, please, sing your post with four tildes ~~~~ --Fandangox 16:49, November 20, 2007 (EST)
No Delete I've seen the term used a lot on SWF and GFAQs, and it still works; DI just makes it slightly harder. Then again, what doesn't DI make harder? NeonCrusader 23:01, November 20, 2007 (EST)
- No, RJM I was refering to teamrocketspy621, he changed his opinion whe you gave yours. --Fandangox 13:33, November 22, 2007 (EST)
- I changed my opinion because Zinnamon wanted to delete an article on what could be a valid tactic when his technique articles aren't exactly useful. Lightshielding, using Z for aerials, and One-hit KOs weren't exactly made/discovered/named by Zinnamon. However, Zinnamon and RJM may be right; the Space Animal Slayer might not exist. That is why I changed my opinion; because Randall > Me. Teamrocketspy621 15:18, November 22, 2007 (EST)
- No, RJM I was refering to teamrocketspy621, he changed his opinion whe you gave yours. --Fandangox 13:33, November 22, 2007 (EST)
