Forum:Articles on universe creators: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Tag: Undo
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Luther Social Media Maven Keezy.Co: Redefining Digital Presence with Creativity and Strategy ==
{{Forumheader|Proposals}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
{{proposal|y|Option 2}}
Recently it's come to my attention that not everyone is quite on the same page when it comes to our scope on real people (specifically developers). Instead of arguing about this one at a time, I believe it more beneficial to come to an agreement on what our scope is when it comes to real people. Here's what we can do
*'''OPTION 1: Only create articles for developers who have directly contributed to the ''Smash'' series. [[List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros.]] gets deleted.'''<br>Any developer article we currently have that does not fit this bill will be deleted.
*'''OPTION 2: Only create articles for developers who have directly contributed to the ''Smash'' series, and other developers get listed on [[List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros.]]'''<br>Articles who do not fit the bill will be merged into the list article and deleted.
*'''OPTION 3: Only create articles for developers who have directly contributed to the ''Smash'' series, and [[List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros.]] gets renamed to "List of developers related to Super Smash Bros." or similar.'''<br>Articles who do not fit the bill will be merged into the list article and deleted, and the major Smash developers get taken off the list.
*'''OPTION 4: Create articles for any developer responsible for the creation of a universe featured in ''Smash''. [[List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros.]] gets deleted.'''
*'''OPTION 5: Leave it alone.'''


In today’s digital age, mastering the art of social media is crucial for businesses, personal brands, and influencers alike. Navigating the dynamic online space requires not just creativity but also a strong strategy, adaptability, and a deep understanding of platforms. That’s where Luther, popularly known as Keezy.Co, comes into play. A rising force in social media management and digital strategy, Keezy.Co has carved a niche for itself by combining authentic content creation with sharp analytics, giving brands a fresh voice and effective online presence.
==Your votes here==
You may vote for more than one. Please be sure to bold your votes. <span style="font-family:Algerian;font-size:10pt;background:#000;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">Serpent</span>]]&nbsp;[[File:SKSig.png|12px|link=]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0">King</span>]]'''</span> 13:57, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''2, 3, or 4''' <span style="font-family:Algerian;font-size:10pt;background:#000;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">Serpent</span>]]&nbsp;[[File:SKSig.png|12px|link=]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0">King</span>]]'''</span> 14:01, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''4 or 5'''. I honestly think that doing this on a case by case basis (which none of the options other than 5 actually allow for) would be best, as some character developers (such as Shigeru Miyamoto) are much more deserving of an article than others (such as Shigesato Itoi). However in the event that 5 is deemed unsatisfactory, I would much prefer 4 be implemented than any other option, as after all part of our duty as a wiki arguably should be to provide information on as many figureheads relevant to the Smash series as we can in order to truly be an encyclopedia on '''all''' things Smash. ''[[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''Jigglypuff trainer'''</span>]]'' 14:06, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
::I see what you are saying, but this is an issue of scope, and scope should, in my opinion, be hammered out and applied across the whole project instead of just here and there. <span style="font-family:Algerian;font-size:10pt;background:#000;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">Serpent</span>]]&nbsp;[[File:SKSig.png|12px|link=]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0">King</span>]]'''</span> 14:10, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
:::I would also move that should an outcome other than 4 or 5 be chosen, that a special exception be made for Shigeru Miyamoto, both due to his undeniable notability and the consensus received during the previous proposal. ''[[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''Jigglypuff trainer'''</span>]]'' 18:14, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''2 or 3'''. Either way, important figures to Smash's development should be given emphasis. All developers, regardless of how major or minor, should be mentioned on the page as well. [[User:MHStarCraft|'''<font color="skyblue">MH</font>''']][[User talk:MHStarCraft|'''<font color="blue">StarCraft</font>''']] [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] 14:17, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''3'''. I don't think it'd be right to give devs who haven't worked on the ''Smash'' games directly their own articles, but at the same time I don't think it'd be fair to delete their presence from the wiki outright. Moving the "not directly involved" devs to a more generalized list would be sufficient enough I feel. [[User:Aliks-Odev|Aliks-Odev]] ([[User talk:Aliks-Odev|talk]]) 15:18, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''Support 2''' If you're a major figurehead of the series, you get a page. If you helped out a bit mostly on stuff related to your home series, you get put in the list. If you own content but haven't actually contributed anything, go be an interwiki link.<br/>By that token, '''explicitly oppose 4'''. I don't want to see us go back there. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Honcho 18:11, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''4 or 5'''. [[User:Iron Warrior|<span style="color: red;">'''Iron Reggie,'''</span>]] [[User talk:Iron Warrior|<span style="color: cyan;">'''the Fearsome Warrior'''</span>]] 18:57, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''Support 2, oppose 4''' I've stated my opinion on this topic more than once, and I don't feel the need to repeat myself. (That, and Toomai kinda summed up what I was going to say anyways) [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 19:24, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''Support 2, oppose 4 and 5''' Pretty much in the same boat as Aidan, but I'll go ahead and post my opinions here. They simply aren't relevant enough. Most if not all the articles would be "X created Y who is playable in Z." A lot of people on the Miyamoto talk page seem to be biased towards him because he's created so many great gaming icons. While that is true, he has almost zero relation to Smash. This is the case with all other character creators. In addition to this, you also have to take into consideration the other co-creators of the character/universe. Wouldn't they deserve the same treatment should option 4 come into fruition? In the end, if option 4 passes, we'd be seeing a lot of small low-effort articles on lots of mostly irrelevant figures. A mention on the significant dev page and a crosswiki link would be the best option here.  [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 20:15, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''3''' [[User:UltraNessDX|UltraNessDX]] ([[User talk:UltraNessDX|talk]]) 14:01, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''2''' [[User:Awesomelink234|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:10pt;background:#00FF20;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px;color:#050DF7">Ian, the Super Cool Sonic Fan </span>]] [[User talk:Awesomelink234|Leave a message if needed]] 16:15, 29 April 2018 (EDT)
*'''1''' or '''2'''. <b>[[User:john3637881|<span style="color: black;">John</span>]]</b> [[File:John3637881 Signature.png|20px]] <b>[[User talk:John3637881|<span style="color: red;">HUAH!</span>]]</b> 13:07, 13 June 2018 (EDT)
*'''2'''/'''3''' [[User:Menshay|Menshay]] ([[User talk:Menshay|talk]]) 12:48, 15 June 2018 (EDT)
*'''2 or 3''', preferably the latter, per Pokebub. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 19:23, 16 June 2018 (EDT)
*'''4''' or '''2'''. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Aykrivwassup|Aykrivwassup]] ([[User talk:Aykrivwassup|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aykrivwassup|contribs]]) 18:17, 20 June 2018 (EDT)</small>
*'''3'''. [[User:Nokii|<span style="color:dodgerblue;">'''Nokii''']]</span>''' <sup>ε</sup>''' (''[[User_talk:Nokii|<span style="color:green;">T]]</span> · [[Special:Contributions/Nokii|<span style="color:green;">C]]</span>'') 19:56, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
*'''1''' or '''3'''. [[User:F0rZ3r0F0r|F0rZ3r0F0r]] ([[User talk:F0rZ3r0F0r|talk]]) 01:52, 3 July 2018 (EDT)
----


But who is Keezy.Co, and why is the world of social media looking to this visionary for inspiration? This article dives into the journey, insights, and unique approach that Luther has brought to the industry, making Keezy.Co a brand synonymous with social media success.
Ok so I am seeing 2 and 3 as the popular opinions here, so it comes down to this: Do we need to list the big contributors on the list or not? 2 is yes, list them; 3 is no, don't list them. <span style="font-family:Algerian;font-size:10pt;background:#000;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">Serpent</span>]]&nbsp;[[File:SKSig.png|12px|link=]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0">King</span>]]'''</span> 19:43, 22 July 2018 (EDT)
 
*Number 2, yes. Also gdi I missed on the voting :c --[[File:BeepYouSignature.png|40px]] [[User:Beep|<font color="Black">'''Beep'''</font>]] [[User talk:Beep|<font color="Black">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 19:56, 22 July 2018 (EDT)
'''The Rise of Keezy.Co'''
*'''Yes''' Still firm to my vote. [[User:Awesomelink234|<span style="font-size:10pt;background:#00FF20;border:outset #083 2px;padding:1px 3px;color:#050DF7">Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan</span>]] [[User talk:Awesomelink234|Leave a message if needed]] 20:01, 22 July 2018 (EDT)
 
*Gonna stick to number 2. [[User:Pokebub|Pokebub]] ([[User talk:Pokebub|talk]]) 04:04, 25 July 2018 (EDT)
Luther, the mastermind behind Keezy.Co, didn’t just stumble upon social media marketing; it was a journey that was honed through passion, practice, and a clear vision for where the digital landscape is heading. Starting as an enthusiast, Luther understood early on that social media was not just about posting content but about building relationships, engaging audiences, and establishing trust between brands and their followers.
*I'll go with option '''2'''. [[User:MHStarCraft|'''<font color="skyblue">MH</font>''']][[User talk:MHStarCraft|'''<font color="blue">StarCraft</font>''']] [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] 21:36, 31 July 2018 (EDT)
 
*'''Number 2'''. For sure. [[User:F0rZ3r0F0r|F0rZ3r0F0r]] ([[User talk:F0rZ3r0F0r|talk]]) 04:55, 7 August 2018 (EDT)
Keezy.Co’s rise began with an innate understanding of the psychology behind user engagement. Whether it’s creating attention-grabbing posts, crafting compelling stories, or managing brand perception, Keezy.Co believes in putting the audience first. This approach, combined with consistent learning and adaptation to the evolving social media algorithms, has made Luther a respected name in the industry.
 
'''The Philosophy Behind Keezy.Co'''
 
What sets Keezy.Co apart from other social media strategists is the belief that authenticity should always come first. Luther’s approach is rooted in the philosophy that the best online presence isn’t just a well-curated feed, but one that resonates with real people. Social media is inundated with influencers and brands vying for attention, but Keezy.Co has been able to break through the noise by focusing on creating meaningful connections rather than just chasing numbers.
 
In Luther's words, “Engagement isn’t just about likes or comments. It’s about building a community that feels seen, heard, and valued.” This people-first mindset has become the cornerstone of Keezy.Co’s strategy, helping brands develop deeper, more authentic relationships with their audience.
 
'''The Power of Storytelling'''
 
A large part of Keezy.Co’s success lies in the power of storytelling. Luther understands that behind every product, service, or individual is a story waiting to be told, and it’s these stories that connect people on a deeper level. Keezy.Co doesn’t just create content for the sake of visibility but rather focuses on weaving narratives that captivate, engage, and inspire audiences.
 
For Keezy.Co, storytelling goes beyond the traditional marketing copy. It involves a thoughtful combination of visuals, captions, and interactions that convey the essence of the brand. Whether it’s a heartfelt post about a brand’s mission or a behind-the-scenes look at a product’s creation, Keezy.Co ensures that every piece of content contributes to the larger narrative a brand is trying to tell.
 
'''The Role of Strategy in Social Media Success'''
 
While creativity is at the heart of Keezy.Co’s content creation, the role of strategy cannot be overstated. Luther believes that every successful social media campaign starts with a clear, data-driven strategy. From understanding the target audience to analyzing competitor trends and leveraging platform algorithms, Keezy.Co ensures that every decision made is backed by insight and analysis.
 
[https://innovexpanse.com/the-rise-of-luther-social-media-maven-keezy-co/ Luther Social Media Maven Keezy.Co] team spend significant time researching and mapping out campaigns to ensure that they align with the brand’s goals. Whether it’s increasing brand awareness, driving conversions, or simply enhancing audience engagement, Keezy.Co’s strategy is tailored to meet the specific needs of each client.
 
One key factor in Keezy.Co’s strategic success is the ability to adapt. Social media platforms are constantly evolving, and what worked last year may not work today. Luther stays ahead of the curve by consistently testing new tactics, staying informed about algorithm changes, and pivoting campaigns when necessary to ensure maximum results.
 
'''Harnessing the Power of Multiple Platforms'''
 
One of the core strengths of Keezy.Co is its multi-platform approach. Luther has mastered the art of utilizing various social media platforms—each with its unique algorithm, user base, and content type—to maximize a brand’s online presence.
 
Instagram: With a focus on visual storytelling, Keezy.Co uses Instagram’s features such as Reels, Stories, and IGTV to engage audiences in creative ways. Luther is known for blending high-quality visuals with captivating captions, resulting in a feed that is both aesthetically pleasing and meaningful.
 
TikTok: Recognizing TikTok’s rising popularity, Keezy.Co has successfully helped brands tap into the platform’s massive user base by creating short, engaging videos that align with trending challenges and themes. Luther’s knack for viral content creation has helped many brands reach younger audiences effectively.
 
LinkedIn: For brands and individuals looking to build a professional reputation, Keezy.Co has a strategic approach to LinkedIn. By sharing thought leadership content and engaging with industry trends, Luther helps brands solidify their credibility in their respective industries.
 
Facebook and Twitter: Despite newer platforms gaining traction, Keezy.Co hasn’t forgotten about the importance of Facebook and Twitter. By creating shareable content and participating in trending discussions, Luther keeps brands relevant and visible across these more established platforms.
 
'''The Importance of Analytics and Data'''
 
While creativity and storytelling are essential, Luther’s data-driven approach is what really sets Keezy.Co apart. Social media success isn't just about creating content; it’s about knowing how to measure that content’s performance and make informed decisions based on those insights. Keezy.Co uses various analytics tools to track the performance of campaigns in real-time, providing insights into what’s working and where improvements can be made.
 
Luther places great emphasis on understanding the audience’s behavior. By analyzing metrics such as engagement rates, reach, impressions, and conversion rates, Keezy.Co ensures that each campaign is optimized for success. This data-driven approach allows brands to continuously refine their strategies, ensuring they stay ahead in the competitive social media landscape.
 
'''Building Long-Lasting Relationships'''
 
A large part of Keezy.Co’s success is the relationships that Luther builds with clients. Luther doesn’t just see clients as a paycheck; instead, Keezy.Co works to form lasting partnerships built on trust, communication, and shared success. By taking the time to understand each client’s unique needs and goals, Keezy.Co is able to deliver personalized strategies that are tailored to each brand.
 
Luther's hands-on approach and transparent communication style have earned Keezy.Co a reputation for reliability and effectiveness. Clients trust Luther to not only manage their social media but also to act as an extension of their brand, ensuring that every post, comment, and interaction reflects their brand’s values and voice.
 
'''The Future of Keezy.Co'''
 
As social media continues to evolve, so too does Keezy.Co. Luther remains committed to staying at the forefront of industry trends, ensuring that clients are always one step ahead of their competitors. With new platforms, features, and algorithms emerging every day, Keezy.Co is prepared to adapt and innovate in order to continue delivering exceptional results.
 
Looking ahead, Luther plans to expand Keezy.Co’s services to include more in-depth content creation, influencer partnerships, and advanced social media analytics. Keezy.Co is also exploring opportunities to work with larger brands and international clients, helping businesses of all sizes grow their online presence in an increasingly globalized world.
 
'''Conclusion'''
 
Keezy.Co, led by Luther, has established itself as a leading social media management company, thanks to its unique blend of creativity, strategy, and authenticity. In a crowded digital landscape, Keezy.Co stands out by focusing on building genuine relationships with audiences and delivering measurable results for clients. Luther’s hands-on approach, coupled with a deep understanding of the ever-evolving social media landscape, ensures that Keezy.Co will continue to be a go-to resource for brands looking to succeed online.
 
As the world of social media continues to grow, Keezy.Co’s ability to adapt and innovate ensures that it will remain at the forefront of the industry, helping brands tell their stories, engage their audiences, and achieve their goals in the digital space.
 
'''Read More At:'''
 
https://ideagenix.com
 
https://techaiglobal.com
 
https://bizcreature.com
 
https://theinsidercraft.com

Latest revision as of 05:17, September 26, 2024

Forums: Index → Proposals → Articles on universe creators
A checkmark symbol, for places like yes/no columns on tables. This is a closed discussion about an accepted proposed change on SmashWiki. It remains for archival purposes.
The closing administrator adds: "Option 2"

Recently it's come to my attention that not everyone is quite on the same page when it comes to our scope on real people (specifically developers). Instead of arguing about this one at a time, I believe it more beneficial to come to an agreement on what our scope is when it comes to real people. Here's what we can do

  • OPTION 1: Only create articles for developers who have directly contributed to the Smash series. List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros. gets deleted.
    Any developer article we currently have that does not fit this bill will be deleted.
  • OPTION 2: Only create articles for developers who have directly contributed to the Smash series, and other developers get listed on List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros.
    Articles who do not fit the bill will be merged into the list article and deleted.
  • OPTION 3: Only create articles for developers who have directly contributed to the Smash series, and List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros. gets renamed to "List of developers related to Super Smash Bros." or similar.
    Articles who do not fit the bill will be merged into the list article and deleted, and the major Smash developers get taken off the list.
  • OPTION 4: Create articles for any developer responsible for the creation of a universe featured in Smash. List of developers significant to Super Smash Bros. gets deleted.
  • OPTION 5: Leave it alone.

Your votes here[edit]

You may vote for more than one. Please be sure to bold your votes. Serpent SKSig.png King 13:57, 6 April 2018 (EDT)

  • 2, 3, or 4 Serpent SKSig.png King 14:01, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • 4 or 5. I honestly think that doing this on a case by case basis (which none of the options other than 5 actually allow for) would be best, as some character developers (such as Shigeru Miyamoto) are much more deserving of an article than others (such as Shigesato Itoi). However in the event that 5 is deemed unsatisfactory, I would much prefer 4 be implemented than any other option, as after all part of our duty as a wiki arguably should be to provide information on as many figureheads relevant to the Smash series as we can in order to truly be an encyclopedia on all things Smash. Alex the Jigglypuff trainer 14:06, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
I see what you are saying, but this is an issue of scope, and scope should, in my opinion, be hammered out and applied across the whole project instead of just here and there. Serpent SKSig.png King 14:10, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
I would also move that should an outcome other than 4 or 5 be chosen, that a special exception be made for Shigeru Miyamoto, both due to his undeniable notability and the consensus received during the previous proposal. Alex the Jigglypuff trainer 18:14, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • 2 or 3. Either way, important figures to Smash's development should be given emphasis. All developers, regardless of how major or minor, should be mentioned on the page as well. MHStarCraft Mega Man X SNES sprite.png 14:17, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • 3. I don't think it'd be right to give devs who haven't worked on the Smash games directly their own articles, but at the same time I don't think it'd be fair to delete their presence from the wiki outright. Moving the "not directly involved" devs to a more generalized list would be sufficient enough I feel. Aliks-Odev (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • Support 2 If you're a major figurehead of the series, you get a page. If you helped out a bit mostly on stuff related to your home series, you get put in the list. If you own content but haven't actually contributed anything, go be an interwiki link.
    By that token, explicitly oppose 4. I don't want to see us go back there. Toomai Glittershine ??? The Honcho 18:11, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • 4 or 5. Iron Reggie, the Fearsome Warrior 18:57, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • Support 2, oppose 4 I've stated my opinion on this topic more than once, and I don't feel the need to repeat myself. (That, and Toomai kinda summed up what I was going to say anyways) Aidan, the Rurouni 19:24, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • Support 2, oppose 4 and 5 Pretty much in the same boat as Aidan, but I'll go ahead and post my opinions here. They simply aren't relevant enough. Most if not all the articles would be "X created Y who is playable in Z." A lot of people on the Miyamoto talk page seem to be biased towards him because he's created so many great gaming icons. While that is true, he has almost zero relation to Smash. This is the case with all other character creators. In addition to this, you also have to take into consideration the other co-creators of the character/universe. Wouldn't they deserve the same treatment should option 4 come into fruition? In the end, if option 4 passes, we'd be seeing a lot of small low-effort articles on lots of mostly irrelevant figures. A mention on the significant dev page and a crosswiki link would be the best option here. Pokebub (talk) 20:15, 6 April 2018 (EDT)
  • 3 UltraNessDX (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
  • 2 Ian, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 16:15, 29 April 2018 (EDT)
  • 1 or 2. John John3637881 Signature.png HUAH! 13:07, 13 June 2018 (EDT)
  • 2/3 Menshay (talk) 12:48, 15 June 2018 (EDT)
  • 2 or 3, preferably the latter, per Pokebub. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 19:23, 16 June 2018 (EDT)
  • 4 or 2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aykrivwassup (talk • contribs) 18:17, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
  • 3. Nokii ε (T · C) 19:56, 25 June 2018 (EDT)
  • 1 or 3. F0rZ3r0F0r (talk) 01:52, 3 July 2018 (EDT)

Ok so I am seeing 2 and 3 as the popular opinions here, so it comes down to this: Do we need to list the big contributors on the list or not? 2 is yes, list them; 3 is no, don't list them. Serpent SKSig.png King 19:43, 22 July 2018 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Forum:Articles_on_universe_creators&oldid=1928017"