User talk:Ultimate Toad/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:And hey since I can't convince you otherwise, why not '''you''' give an explanation on how Kirby is "good" and Pikachu is "broken"? Go on, I'm a patiant mushroom. [[Image:001Toad.jpg|20px]] <span style="font-family: Algerian">'''[[User:OmegaToad64|<font color="green">Omegα</font>]][[User talk:OmegaToad64|<font color="red">Toαd</font><font color="blue">64</font>]]'''</span> 08:48, February 11, 2020 (EST) | :And hey since I can't convince you otherwise, why not '''you''' give an explanation on how Kirby is "good" and Pikachu is "broken"? Go on, I'm a patiant mushroom. [[Image:001Toad.jpg|20px]] <span style="font-family: Algerian">'''[[User:OmegaToad64|<font color="green">Omegα</font>]][[User talk:OmegaToad64|<font color="red">Toαd</font><font color="blue">64</font>]]'''</span> 08:48, February 11, 2020 (EST) | ||
Well, i don't think that Pikachu is broken, but i think that it's obnoxious to face. While it lacks range, its fast mobility and attacks, its projectiles and its aerials can cause a lot of pressure. Its recovery is very hard to stop as it has both a very long distance and it's hard to predict Quick Attack. Not to mention that its aerials have good zero-to death potential and only down aerial has over 20 frames of ending lag, all of them can autocancel in a short hop and its easy to capitalize on them and Pikachu's edgeguarding, which is possibly the best in the game. The fact is that since Pikachu can do that, it can force you to camp him with long range moves, as its range is really poor. Simon for istance, has so many options to keep Pikachu at bay and stop it. I just think that Pikachu should receive nerfs to its aerials because it capitalizes a bit too much on them. | |||
Revision as of 08:57, February 11, 2020
 |
 |
User rename
Your username has been successfully changed from "Supatoad64" to "OmegaToad64" as per your request. Please remember that you are responsible for fixing any double redirects that this may have caused. Thanks!
Also sorry about the delay on this, I kind of forgot about it for a second. SerpentKing 14:38, February 9, 2020 (EST)
Hi there!
Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your contributions! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.
- Read this first as it provides many great resources designed to help users get oriented with the wiki and become part of the community.
- Visit the recent changes to see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
- Questions? You can ask at the help desk or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!
- Need help? The community portal has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit.
I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you!
Sorry for the late welcome. Cookies
Creme 23:14, February 9, 2020 (EST)
You're acting in bad faith
I don't want to be obnoxious or annoying, but apart the fact that you're accusing me of favouritism when i'm not, you're not letting me doing my contribute. That thing i put on Bowser's neutral aerial, his up tilt's startup and his forward smash's frame data, it's not opionionated at all, this is a fact. You're also acting in bad faith, as you bash me for an opinion. You can't force an opinion on me, and if you keep on doing this, i'll report. 79.18.11.200 08:36, February 11, 2020 (EST)
- Have you ever stopped to think why we keep removing your edits? You keep claiming none of the stuff you write are opinions, in which they are. If you want to know what sugarcoating is: Kirby being "greatly" buffed is not the same as "noticeably" buffed. "greatly" means he can potentially be mid or upper-mid tier, while "noticeably" means he has been buffed to a good extent, but not enough to be out of the lower tiers. Also you threatening me with an admin report qualifies as block talk, something you do not have the rights to do, so you're the one acting in bad faith.
- And hey since I can't convince you otherwise, why not you give an explanation on how Kirby is "good" and Pikachu is "broken"? Go on, I'm a patiant mushroom.
OmegαToαd64 08:48, February 11, 2020 (EST)
Well, i don't think that Pikachu is broken, but i think that it's obnoxious to face. While it lacks range, its fast mobility and attacks, its projectiles and its aerials can cause a lot of pressure. Its recovery is very hard to stop as it has both a very long distance and it's hard to predict Quick Attack. Not to mention that its aerials have good zero-to death potential and only down aerial has over 20 frames of ending lag, all of them can autocancel in a short hop and its easy to capitalize on them and Pikachu's edgeguarding, which is possibly the best in the game. The fact is that since Pikachu can do that, it can force you to camp him with long range moves, as its range is really poor. Simon for istance, has so many options to keep Pikachu at bay and stop it. I just think that Pikachu should receive nerfs to its aerials because it capitalizes a bit too much on them.
