Talk:Piranha Plant void glitch: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New Page: ==Merge== The freeze glitch linked only pertains to Ice Climbers, while this is for Piranha Plant and Ganondorf. I don't believe we should merge unless there's a page dedicated to all f...) |
F0rZ3r0F0r (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merge== | ==Merge== | ||
The freeze glitch linked only pertains to Ice Climbers, while this is for Piranha Plant and Ganondorf. I don't believe we should merge unless there's a page dedicated to all freeze glitches, which in that case both articles should be merged there. Therefore, '''I oppose'''. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 20:50, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | The freeze glitch linked only pertains to Ice Climbers, while this is for Piranha Plant and Ganondorf. I don't believe we should merge unless there's a page dedicated to all freeze glitches, which in that case both articles should be merged there. Therefore, '''I oppose'''. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 20:50, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:I don't see anything wrong with rewriting the [[Freeze glitch]] page in this case as a blanket statement for all variants of freeze glitches. It'd be more sensible than having multiple pages for obscure variants of them. [[User:F0rZ3r0F0r|F0rZ3r0F0r]] ([[User talk:F0rZ3r0F0r|talk]]) 18:23, April 24, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:23, April 24, 2019
Merge
The freeze glitch linked only pertains to Ice Climbers, while this is for Piranha Plant and Ganondorf. I don't believe we should merge unless there's a page dedicated to all freeze glitches, which in that case both articles should be merged there. Therefore, I oppose. SugarCookie 420 20:50, April 22, 2019 (EDT)
- I don't see anything wrong with rewriting the Freeze glitch page in this case as a blanket statement for all variants of freeze glitches. It'd be more sensible than having multiple pages for obscure variants of them. F0rZ3r0F0r (talk) 18:23, April 24, 2019 (EDT)
