Talk:Final Destination (SSBU)

Deletion

Oppose deletion; I don't have the timestamp handy, but I believe it was confirmed during Treehouse Live that SSBU has a separate Final Destination and that the Battlefield omega from the E3 demo was a placeholder. Given that, and the fact that it's likely (although not yet confirmed) that this is FD given its similarity to other incarnations of FD and lack of indication of it being any other stage, I don't think it's too early to make this. Miles (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2018 (EDT)

Well at its core, the assumption that the stage in that screenshot is FD is a speculation. "We don't know what else it could be" does not really work as proof for me. Nevertheless I'll restore this if there is to be a discussion here. Serpent  King 16:44, 28 July 2018 (EDT)

I put deletion on the page on the grounds that A. we don't have anything to go off of other than speculation and B. the only noteworthy thing about this is that it was made as Battlefield's omega in E3 to hide its true design. I'm again going to say that this page feels like it was made just for the sake of making it. Aidan, the College-Bound Rurouni 17:03, 28 July 2018 (EDT)

I also oppose deletion, because when the time comes in which we actually know about the Final Destination in this game, I believe it would be easier to expand on this article rather than restoring it. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 20:43, 28 July 2018 (EDT)

Strong support. It's not hard to restore a page, and this article sounds very speculative and unprofessional. If we removed the speculation, it would have no information at all. It's not worth making a page yet when we haven't seen the stage. TheNuttyOne 21:59, 28 July 2018 (EDT)

Support. The existence of this page literally goes against the big notice banner on top of the website that's visible everywhere. If there's ONE reason to keep the article, it'd be that deleting it and creating it back later seems a bit redundant. But by all accounts, the article shouldn't have been created in the first place. --Gabo 2oo (talk) 21:58, 29 July 2018 (EDT)

I now support deletion for the reasons above. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 22:19, 29 July 2018 (EDT)

Support As do I. This article, at the moment, is going against our "no speculation" rule. Speed48 13:33, 30 July 2018 (EDT)

Support deletion for the same reason as pretty much everyone else above me. 72.133.91.93 08:51, 31 July 2018 (EDT)Blueflame105

Support: We know that the game will have a Final Destination, and that it's not the one in the demo. That's literally all the info we have to work with at the moment. As the main banner says: "Do not create tiny pages just so the page exists." VoqéoT 08:57, 31 July 2018 (EDT)

Merge

Support I personally believe that although each game has its own Final Destination they are really just the same only being different by the way they look so they don't each need their own article unlike fighters which can change drastically between games.
CaptainDabsalot (talk•Contributoins) 12:44, 6 November 2018 (EST)

Strong Oppose See my comment on Talk:Battlefield (SSBU) for my reason of opposition. Corrin Fan 12:50, 6 November 2018 (EST)

Oppose. I think this proposal demonstrates a lack of understanding of how articles on the wiki work. SuperFalconBros (talk) 13:45, 6 November 2018 (EST)