User talk:TheNuttyOne/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
:::I'm not looking at 1RV right now and have admitted that I was in the wrong there. Throwing my mistakes that I've admitted to back in my face to try to get out of another policy that goes against you really makes you look immature. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small> 15:21, 27 January 2016 (EST) | :::I'm not looking at 1RV right now and have admitted that I was in the wrong there. Throwing my mistakes that I've admitted to back in my face to try to get out of another policy that goes against you really makes you look immature. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small> 15:21, 27 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::::Let me present it this way. Page moves like that require a discussion to reach consensus. Admins, who are responsible for managing discussions, determined it didn't have sufficient consensus. "Admins aren't more important than users" means we don't count for "extra points" in discussions, and we're not inherently "always right"; however, we do have a job to do in managing discussions. Disagreeing with a resolution is one thing, but repeatedly and vehemently arguing every time an admin tries to resolve the situation is frustrating. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 16:06, 27 January 2016 (EST) | ::::Let me present it this way. Page moves like that require a discussion to reach consensus. Admins, who are responsible for managing discussions, determined it didn't have sufficient consensus. "Admins aren't more important than users" means we don't count for "extra points" in discussions, and we're not inherently "always right"; however, we do have a job to do in managing discussions. Disagreeing with a resolution is one thing, but repeatedly and vehemently arguing every time an admin tries to resolve the situation is frustrating. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 16:06, 27 January 2016 (EST) | ||
Looking at this from the perspective of someone who wasn't involved, I see a highly fragmented move discussion that went nowhere and was agreed to be going nowhere, so it was closed and the status quo was upheld. Do you really think that opening it back up immediately would do anything but repeat the exact same results, therefore wasting everyone's time? Calling it a "new discussion" isn't magically going to change people's opinion on the issue. No one's going to like the results of every single discussion we have; don't be the one guy that can't accept defeat and move on. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Sphere 16:14, 27 January 2016 (EST) | |||
