User talk:Amber Blackstar/Archive 11

About the Scrub Rush page

To be honest, I don't know exactly what to call the article, because there are multiple different names for it. and for each different variation there is people who do and do not know what speak of, such as yourself. The only reason I decided on "Scrub Rush" was because SSBM Tutorials called it that, so I settled on that. To see exactly what I am talking about, please visit the link below

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ym0-J_wYSE8

I hope this can clear any confusion. Thank you!

Skittles03 (talk) 18:44, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

Two things

PM did not happen at BAM7, but it was at a tournament leading up to it called Project Melbourne. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SloEYXHEle0

In any case, I was wondering how we should handle the Project M side event at Super Smash Con 2017. I see two ways of handling it:

1.We do the same thing as SSC 2016 and keep it on the page as a "side event".

2.We give it its own page.

I list the second one because of the fact that people are not allowed to talk about it ( https://www.reddit.com/r/SSBPM/comments/6sgopq/goode_with_the_goods_at_super_smash_con_for_pm/ ), but I leave the first option open because of what we did for the first 2 SSCs. In any case, the event in of itself is probably significant enough to warrant its own page if needed, given that Gallo, Switch, HyperFlame, BP, and more will be attending and it will most likely break 100 entrants. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diamond444 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 11 August 2017‎ (EST)

Hmm...well first off, please remember to sign your comments. Second, considering the one at SSC 2016 is still on the page despite having 134 entrants, I'd say keep it listed as a side event, but maybe have a note somewhere on the article explaining the circumstances behind the PM tournament. If there's ever a problem, we can easily split it into its own article later. Disaster Flare (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2017 (EDT)

My apologies. It has been a while since I last used a userspace. Anyways, thank you. Diamond444 (talk) 18:47, 11 August 2017 (EDT)

Old results on dead sites

I saw your edit summary here; have you tried using the Web Archive to check if there's a version of the page you were trying to reference? Miles (talk) 16:46, 14 August 2017 (EDT)