SmashWiki talk:Consensus: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 13:16, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | ::--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 13:16, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
:::Yeah maybe you're right. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #0b7">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #fd0">King</span>]]'''</span> 13:18, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | :::Yeah maybe you're right. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #0b7">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #fd0">King</span>]]'''</span> 13:18, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
Related to the idea of needing consensus for major template or style changes: perhaps we should specify seeking consensus for layout or design changes affecting a large number of pages at once? It's a recurring issue of someone deciding to make a change on 40 pages at once without having any discussion first, and trying to revert a ton of changes at once just to restore status quo during a talk page discussion is a real headache. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 22:35, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:35, July 8, 2017
Policy discussion
Support
- Support as nom. Serpent
King 12:42, 8 July 2017 (EDT) - Support this is basically policy already, it just hasn't been written down before now, so I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be made official. Alex Parpotta the flying lobster! 13:14, 8 July 2017 (EDT)
- Support, but only as a policy. --- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 13:17, 8 July 2017 (EDT)
- Shut up and take my support! --
Beep (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2017 (EDT) - May be a little late, but support, this is the way I've been trying to do things personally and I have no problems with it
Nymbare and his talk 17:02, 8 July 2017 (EDT) - Support
A51 Trooper 19:42, 8 July 2017 (EDT) - Support, because we definitely need a clear-cut procedure for a consensus. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 20:32, 8 July 2017 (EDT)
Oppose
Neutral
- Neutral leaning towards oppose. I'm not sure that there's even a need to explain the concept, and going too much into specifics could be overly restrictive and rigid.
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 20:47, 8 July 2017 (EDT)
Comments
Will this be considered a policy or a guideline?
--- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 13:10, 8 July 2017 (EDT)
- Not entirely sure at the present, although I think I am leaning more towards guideline. Serpent King 13:14, 8 July 2017 (EDT)
- I'd support as a policy, but not as a guideline; I feel this is something that should be considered a "core" policy of any Wiki.
Related to the idea of needing consensus for major template or style changes: perhaps we should specify seeking consensus for layout or design changes affecting a large number of pages at once? It's a recurring issue of someone deciding to make a change on 40 pages at once without having any discussion first, and trying to revert a ton of changes at once just to restore status quo during a talk page discussion is a real headache. Miles (talk) 22:35, 8 July 2017 (EDT)
