Talk:Amiibo Tournament: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ragnarok320 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
: '''Merge''' Definitely shouldn't have its own article. It's simply not notable enough. [[File:RagnarokHau.png|17px|link=]] [[User:Ragnarok320|<span style="color: red;">'''Ragnarok320, The Toa of Fire''']]</span> [[File:RagnarokSignature.png|20px|link=]] [[User talk:Ragnarok320|<span style="color: black;">'''(talk)'''</span>]] 23:37, 2 June 2016 (EST) | : '''Merge''' Definitely shouldn't have its own article. It's simply not notable enough. [[File:RagnarokHau.png|17px|link=]] [[User:Ragnarok320|<span style="color: red;">'''Ragnarok320, The Toa of Fire''']]</span> [[File:RagnarokSignature.png|20px|link=]] [[User talk:Ragnarok320|<span style="color: black;">'''(talk)'''</span>]] 23:37, 2 June 2016 (EST) | ||
:'''Merge''', definitely [[User:Nymbare|<span style="color:#00BFFF">Nymbare</span>]] [[User talk:Nymbare|<span style="color:#0066FF">and his talk</span>]] 09:32, 3 June 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:32, June 3, 2016
Deletion
As the person who added the tag, I support. Even if amiibo tournaments were notable, they're not near notable enough to have their own article. Disaster Flare 
(talk) 15:38, 2 June 2016 (EDT)
- Weak oppose. Amiibo tournaments have received a decent amount of coverage in the media, such as here, and Nintendo has even held an official amiibo tournament. I don't believe individual tournaments are notable enough for pages, but the concept itself should have one.
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 16:15, 2 June 2016 (EDT) - Support either deletion or a merge with (or at least a mention in) the amiibo page. The concept just doesn't feel that relevant. -Menshay (talk) 17:40, 2 June 2016 (EDT)
Merge with this section, per Nyarglebargle's argument.
--- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 18:03, 2 June 2016 (EDT)
- Merge per Monsier Crow. John
PK SMAAAASH!! 19:06, 2 June 2016 (EDT) - I agree Merge. Serpent
King 19:42, 2 June 2016 (EDT)
- Merge Definitely shouldn't have its own article. It's simply not notable enough.
Ragnarok320, The Toa of Fire 
(talk) 23:37, 2 June 2016 (EST) - Merge, definitely Nymbare and his talk 09:32, 3 June 2016 (EDT)
