Team talk:Deadly Alliance: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Serpent King (talk | contribs) m (Serpent King moved page Talk:Empire Arcadia to Talk:Deadly Alliance: Name on Social Media) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Move== | ==Move== | ||
Considering that Deadly Alliance is a redirect to this page, yes. '''Support'''. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Saiyan 19:12, 27 April 2016 (EDT) | Considering that Deadly Alliance is a redirect to this page, yes. '''Support'''. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Saiyan 19:12, 27 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
=="Inaccurate information"== | |||
All the controversy that surrounded EMP written on the page was completely true. The person who removed that information was, I suspect, trying to cover up their team's controversy. I would understand if an old-school DA member wanted to restore the page back to DA to separate themselves from the shadiness of EMP, but the way the editor handled the page looked like that they were trying to cover up their team's controversy. I'm not sure what's going on with DA or if they split with EMP or something, but in that case, two completely distinct articles should be created. --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 05:40, 13 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:40, May 13, 2016
Move
Considering that Deadly Alliance is a redirect to this page, yes. Support. Dots (talk) 
The Saiyan 19:12, 27 April 2016 (EDT)
"Inaccurate information"
All the controversy that surrounded EMP written on the page was completely true. The person who removed that information was, I suspect, trying to cover up their team's controversy. I would understand if an old-school DA member wanted to restore the page back to DA to separate themselves from the shadiness of EMP, but the way the editor handled the page looked like that they were trying to cover up their team's controversy. I'm not sure what's going on with DA or if they split with EMP or something, but in that case, two completely distinct articles should be created. --Timson622222 (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2016 (EDT)
