951
edits
Talk:Source Gaming: Difference between revisions
→Deletion
PushDustIn (talk | contribs) |
MuteSpittah (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:::::::It wasn't just individual, it was very much a community thing. Even if you go back on this Wiki, the information sourced was from an individual on Neogaf who made a lot of claims several years ago. The information was accepted as truth, and no one bothered to research it until we did. I really think if you are going to have pages for individual Smashers on this Wiki, SG fits in as well. --[[User:PushDustIn|PushDustIn]] ([[User talk:PushDustIn|talk]]) 07:18, 24 February 2016 (EST) | :::::::It wasn't just individual, it was very much a community thing. Even if you go back on this Wiki, the information sourced was from an individual on Neogaf who made a lot of claims several years ago. The information was accepted as truth, and no one bothered to research it until we did. I really think if you are going to have pages for individual Smashers on this Wiki, SG fits in as well. --[[User:PushDustIn|PushDustIn]] ([[User talk:PushDustIn|talk]]) 07:18, 24 February 2016 (EST) | ||
::::::::Supplying misinformation is on the supplier, believing misinformation is on the believer. I'm not sure if the sources of claims years ago were given their own pages, or if they were just mentioned on pages, or sourced. | |||
::::::::I really hope I'm not coming across as wanting to discredit all that you've and all the other people at SG have done. Like, the translations are fantastic work and I love reading them. But, for this wiki, I think we should wait and see how you develop SG and maybe consider giving it a page later depending on what it turns into. SG not having a page on Smashwiki isn't disregarding your work; it just doesn't seem to be a fitting thing to add. At least not right now. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 07:25, 24 February 2016 (EST) | |||