24
edits
Talk:Source Gaming: Difference between revisions
→Deletion
MuteSpittah (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
PushDustIn (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::::::Hmmmm...I think my wording sucks. I would say that SG has had significance to the community thanks to the translations. It's just that I don't think SG is fitting and/or qualified to have its own article in Smashwiki? We use sources and cite them, and I think SG is credited for a decent amount of trivia and development info at the very least. I'm not sure it's necessary to go as far as to give it its own page. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 07:01, 24 February 2016 (EST) | ::::::Hmmmm...I think my wording sucks. I would say that SG has had significance to the community thanks to the translations. It's just that I don't think SG is fitting and/or qualified to have its own article in Smashwiki? We use sources and cite them, and I think SG is credited for a decent amount of trivia and development info at the very least. I'm not sure it's necessary to go as far as to give it its own page. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 07:01, 24 February 2016 (EST) | ||
:::::::It wasn't just individual, it was very much a community thing. Even if you go back on this Wiki, the information sourced was from an individual on Neogaf who made a lot of claims several years ago. The information was accepted as truth, and no one bothered to research it until we did. I really think if you are going to have pages for individual Smashers on this Wiki, SG fits in as well. --[[User:PushDustIn|PushDustIn]] ([[User talk:PushDustIn|talk]]) 07:18, 24 February 2016 (EST) | |||