SmashWiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 8: Difference between revisions
Drilly Dilly (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
==Sockpuppet reports== | ==Sockpuppet reports== | ||
{{IP|Tekkenfan101}} Seems to be the hacker known as IronMaidMaryan. - [[User:Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: blue">'''Drilly'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: red">'''the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Drilly Dilly|<span style="color: purple">'''Hedgehog'''</span>]] 17:43, 7 November 2015 (EST) | |||
On [[User talk:Disaster Flare]], a bunch of accounts that have not made any edits except arguing the exact same point within little time of each other are trying to stir up drama. | On [[User talk:Disaster Flare]], a bunch of accounts that have not made any edits except arguing the exact same point within little time of each other are trying to stir up drama. | ||
*{{IP|J7paul}} | *{{IP|J7paul}} |
Revision as of 17:43, November 7, 2015
The Administrators' noticeboard is intended to be a page to quickly alert the administrators to issues that need their attention.
To make a request or statement, create a new section and provide a neutral, precise summary of events with thought-out reasoning, and, if possible, links to any pages with relevant discussions. It is also a good idea to notify any users involved with the request with a link to the section on this page. Make sure to add new sections to the bottom.
Report vandals and sockpuppets at the top of the appropriate section labeled for such reports at the using {{IP|Username}}, where Username is the name of the user or the IP vandal's IP address.
For reporting similar and unacceptable usernames, report them here instead of on this page. This is done to keep the reports in one place, and because unacceptable usernames can be more subjective (unlike vandal/spam accounts), which may necessitate discussion (which the linked page will be more suited to handle).
Vandal/Spam account reports
173.238.14.121 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Yoshi. Disaster Flare (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2015 (EST)
174.54.124.132 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Judging by this person's contrib history, going on a limb, but have a sneaking suspicion they're a troll. They refuse to sign comments and they keep constantly going to people asking for characters they want for Smash added to their wishlists. Disaster Flare (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2015 (EST)
- Still feel like it's not quite enough to assume bad faith yet. If we have any more problems in the near future, I'll block them. Nyargleblargle (Talk | Contribs) 13:45, 6 November 2015 (EST)
Nart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Smasher:Denti. Disaster Flare (talk) 22:48, 3 November 2015 (EST)
Spinduh (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Smasher:Charliedaking. Disaster Flare (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2015 (EST)
109.70.82.5 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalising Smasher:DerpinGoose. Zyrac (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2015 (EST)
HeroOfLimes (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Mario. Disaster Flare (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2015 (EST)
- Also is making inappropriate pages. Aidan, the Wandering Space Warrior 16:07, 2 November 2015 (EST)
73.15.170.185 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Blanking out random parts of pages. Ganonmew, The Thankful Evil Clone 21:34, 1 November 2015 (EST)
73.185.36.79 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Drex. Serpent∞King (talk) 03:55, 31 October 2015 (EDT)
68.61.182.60 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Smasher:Kels. Disaster Flare (talk) 21:35, 30 October 2015 (EDT)
- Also vandalized Smasher:Mew2King. Disaster Flare (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2015 (EDT)
Lilt26 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Smasher:Chillin. Disaster Flare (talk) 20:16, 28 October 2015 (EDT)
- 50.179.217.203 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Also vandalized Chillin. Due to the manner of the vandalism, could be the same person. Disaster Flare (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2015 (EDT)
- Wasn't there an autoblock enabled? - Drilly the Hedgehog 00:09, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- What? Serpent∞King (talk) 00:12, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- What do you mean "what"? - Drilly the Hedgehog 00:15, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- There is no such thing as an autoblock. Serpent∞King (talk) 00:16, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- You don't know that because you've never been blocked, nor have you actually paid attention to Special:BlockList. - Drilly the Hedgehog 00:18, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- There is no such thing as an autoblock. Serpent∞King (talk) 00:16, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- What do you mean "what"? - Drilly the Hedgehog 00:15, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- What? Serpent∞King (talk) 00:12, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
- Wasn't there an autoblock enabled? - Drilly the Hedgehog 00:09, 29 October 2015 (EDT)
DarkLink (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized the rumors page. A small vandalize, but still vandalism regardless. Disaster Flare (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
68.148.64.23 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalised Lucas Serpent∞King (talk) 22:55, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
FagBagzbigolddrops (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalised SSB4. Only one violation so far, but don't drop your guard. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 12:00, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- I went to click undo, but you beat me to the punch. Oh well better luck next time... Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 12:01, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'm on guard. INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 12:02, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'm also playing SSBM opening (Brawl version) theme for this. xD INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 12:04, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- xD I have to go for now so... I'll leave it to you. Sorry, Ganonmew... Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 12:08, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'm also playing SSBM opening (Brawl version) theme for this. xD INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 12:04, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
Nutcake the Destroyer (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · the Destroyer WHOIS) Vandalism and continuously puts inappropriate content. - Drilly the Hedgehog 04:03, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- I really can't leave for more than a half hour can I? Serpent∞King (talk) 04:19, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- Can't you take a break and just leave it to me? - Drilly the Hedgehog 04:22, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- Nah, me and INoMed have it under control. Serpent∞King (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- Um, what about me? - Drilly the Hedgehog 04:27, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- You can help if you want...Serpent∞King (talk) 04:28, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- Um, what about me? - Drilly the Hedgehog 04:27, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- Nah, me and INoMed have it under control. Serpent∞King (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- Can't you take a break and just leave it to me? - Drilly the Hedgehog 04:22, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
(reset indent) Sure, but I'm saying that if you want a 30-minute coffee break, you can just leave it to INoMed and me. - Drilly the Hedgehog 04:29, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
Black pearl124 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · pearl124 WHOIS) Vandalized EmmiZhang Serpent∞King (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- Oh Nvm. Miles got it. Serpent∞King (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
DeezNuts (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) He's back. Serpent∞King (talk) 01:56, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
Hairball (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalizing Daisy and Dr. Mario. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 11:28, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- I honestly have to believe that all of these vandals are the same person. Particularly since they seem to know several of the users on here (i.e. Ganonmew and Nyargleblargle). ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 11:30, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
Justin Bieber SUCKS! (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · Bieber SUCKS! WHOIS) Another one, vandalizing the board. Serpent∞King (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Looked it up, he was blocked once already. Serpent∞King (talk) 04:42, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
MynameisJARED (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Meta Knight. possibly a sockpuppet of the below. Serpent∞King (talk) 02:27, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- The thing is, I saw this guy create this account yesterday, but is acting now, I had my suspicions, but I doubt it's the same person. Disaster Flare (talk) 02:28, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- This guy also seems to take a liking to ZSS... Disaster Flare (talk) 02:37, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Who wouldn't? Serpent∞King (talk) 02:39, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- True, but he doesn't have to be...pardon by rudeness...public perv about it. Disaster Flare (talk) 02:40, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Um, gay males...? Seriously, this perv needs to be dealt with (in the name of Ta__s Checkers!). - Drilly the Hedgehog 03:47, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Not trying to be offensive, trying to lighten the mood. Serpent∞King (talk) 02:43, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Nah we get ya, to be honest I have a liking to her too, but I would not be this perverted about it. Disaster Flare (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Why the heck not? XD Anyway vandal's gone now, we can sleep...or at least I can. Good night guys. Disaster Flare (talk) 02:46, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Um, gay males...? Seriously, this perv needs to be dealt with (in the name of Ta__s Checkers!). - Drilly the Hedgehog 03:47, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- True, but he doesn't have to be...pardon by rudeness...public perv about it. Disaster Flare (talk) 02:40, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- Who wouldn't? Serpent∞King (talk) 02:39, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
- This guy also seems to take a liking to ZSS... Disaster Flare (talk) 02:37, 23 October 2015 (EDT)
173.32.83.15 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Vandalized Meta Knight. Disaster Flare (talk) 19:56, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
Tailwhipper (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Blanking pages and replacing it with the delete tag marked vandalism. Disaster Flare (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- Also sent a personal attack against Drilly Dilly. Disaster Flare (talk) 19:01, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- Creating spam pages. Disaster Flare (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
Sockpuppet reports
Tekkenfan101 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS) Seems to be the hacker known as IronMaidMaryan. - Drilly the Hedgehog 17:43, 7 November 2015 (EST)
On User talk:Disaster Flare, a bunch of accounts that have not made any edits except arguing the exact same point within little time of each other are trying to stir up drama.
- J7paul (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS)
- Lunasol (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · WHOIS)
- Da law (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · law WHOIS)
- John numbers (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log · numbers WHOIS) ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 00:05, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Seems to be good faith, though. Serpent∞King (talk) 00:19, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Ehhh... I mean, they made what appears to be a vanity article, got unacceptably irritated when questioned, made several accounts to argue their own point, and then backpedaled when they were called out on it. I wouldn't call that good faith. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 00:22, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Although, they do appear to be sticking around despite the article being deleted. Who knows. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 00:24, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- I deleted what appeared to be the page of contention. If they demonstrate bad faith more blatantly, I'll take action. Miles (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Are you at least going to look into the sockpuppet thing? At the very least he's a good-faith user that we can just tell "hey that's against the rules" and he won't do it again in the future. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 00:27, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Let's see. Those four are indeed all the same IP, as are "Suno", "P0lka", "Hhggjghfgdudh", "Pikmintho", "Scorpionmasterxd", and notably, "Ness sucks" (blocked for vandalizing Jamal's talk page by spamming {{notable}}). I think it's time to permablock all of those but J7paul, who is on his last chance. Miles (talk) 00:31, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Well now I'm a little concerned. Here's hoping he becomes a functioning member of society. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 00:34, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- I wondered if it was Ness Sucks. I saw him lurking. Serpent∞King (talk) 00:36, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Well now I'm a little concerned. Here's hoping he becomes a functioning member of society. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 00:34, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Let's see. Those four are indeed all the same IP, as are "Suno", "P0lka", "Hhggjghfgdudh", "Pikmintho", "Scorpionmasterxd", and notably, "Ness sucks" (blocked for vandalizing Jamal's talk page by spamming {{notable}}). I think it's time to permablock all of those but J7paul, who is on his last chance. Miles (talk) 00:31, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- Are you at least going to look into the sockpuppet thing? At the very least he's a good-faith user that we can just tell "hey that's against the rules" and he won't do it again in the future. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 00:27, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
- I deleted what appeared to be the page of contention. If they demonstrate bad faith more blatantly, I'll take action. Miles (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2015 (EDT)
Thought I just say something random about the recent vandalism on this wiki.
So it appears that most of the recent IP vandals that I've searched up are from the United Kingdom or Puerto Rico. It sure seems like we're having two different repeating vandals. :P Dots (talk) The Engineer 19:17, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- Huh... Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 19:23, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- @Ganonmew: Sorry if I had bad grammar on my last sentence but what I mean is that I used this website to find out where the recent IP vandals' world locations are. Dots (talk) The Marine 19:37, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- That's not what I meant. I meant that you could be on to something. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 19:50, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- What do you mean by I'm on to something? I was only stating a random fact to note about the recent vandalism that has been going around. Dots (talk) The Sandvich 20:08, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- Eh, idk, but there is definitely sockpuppetry going on. It reminds me of a vandal that had to be dealt with a few years ago named Mr. Curious. (Go ask someone like OT or ToastUltimatum: I don't really know) The difference is that there is two instead of one. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 20:18, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- What do you mean by I'm on to something? I was only stating a random fact to note about the recent vandalism that has been going around. Dots (talk) The Sandvich 20:08, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- That's not what I meant. I meant that you could be on to something. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 19:50, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- @Ganonmew: Sorry if I had bad grammar on my last sentence but what I mean is that I used this website to find out where the recent IP vandals' world locations are. Dots (talk) The Marine 19:37, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
Obviously, we can't block entire territories. How closely grouped are these IPs? Nyargleblargle (Talk · Contribs) 20:49, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
- I'm not sure if they're working on the same side against the wiki or not but its something to note on. The vandal usernames on the other hand, I have no idea if they're connected with the IPs as well. Dots (talk) The EarthBound 21:11, 20 October 2015 (EDT)
On this note, why did we open up page creation again? I don't think I've seen many good new pages by IPs and Unconfirmed users, and, to be honest, the wait time is so low that I think legit editors would rather wait anyway... ScoreCounter 04:35, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- That...actually sounds like a good idea. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 14:25, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- Agreed. Serpent∞King (talk) 15:10, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
- Re-raising the point after what just happened. ScoreCounter 12:01, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- Y'know, creating new pages with absurd titles is not a very effective form of vandalism. It's annoying to us, but anyone coming here to look up information isn't going to be hindered at all. I'd rather have vandals doing that than messing with actual articles. Zyrac (talk) 12:05, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- Exactly. Nyargleblargle (Talk · Contribs) 12:06, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- That's also true. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 12:09, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- Conversley, it's an invisible mess that's much more of a pain to clean up afterwards. You can argue it both ways, I guess. I personally would sooner have a more visible mess that no-one ends up seeing because it get's RB'ed within seconds, rather than a slightly less apparent mess that takes ages to get rid of. ScoreCounter 12:12, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- That's also true. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by BOO! Or maybe Nutta. 12:09, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- Exactly. Nyargleblargle (Talk · Contribs) 12:06, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- Y'know, creating new pages with absurd titles is not a very effective form of vandalism. It's annoying to us, but anyone coming here to look up information isn't going to be hindered at all. I'd rather have vandals doing that than messing with actual articles. Zyrac (talk) 12:05, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- Re-raising the point after what just happened. ScoreCounter 12:01, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- Agreed. Serpent∞King (talk) 15:10, 21 October 2015 (EDT)
I think that we should let them do this. It is easier to clean up, as we just add d tags. It won't effect casual surfing. Don't make it harder to vandalize, as then it is also harder to check for real changes in rec changes and history. What do you think? DekZek, The creature of your nightmares 12:16, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
- DekZek's got a point, we can't treat vandals like it's a problem we can permanently solve. It's a problem we will always face on any Wiki. The best thing we can do is add d tags and revert when necessary. Disaster Flare (talk) 12:18, 22 October 2015 (EDT)
I didn't really think that this section was to do with how to get rid of the vandals. We simply can't, but just blocking them and reverting their edits. If we get attacked daily, then we just have to prevent the vandals from doing damage. Dots (talk) The Smiley 13:25, 22 October 2015 (EDT)