7,414
edits
SmashWiki talk:Junior administrators (version 3): Difference between revisions
SmashWiki talk:Junior administrators (version 3) (edit)
Revision as of 18:52, October 24, 2015
, 9 years ago→Some qualms: new section
ScoreCounter (talk | contribs) |
(→Some qualms: new section) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:::::A block by any other name is still a block, and a power that really shouldn't be extended below admin-level. It's a power with a huge potential for misuse, and there's a reason we require a community consensus significantly in favor of an RfA candidate to give someone such a power. Right now we have three active admins (myself, Toomai, Nyargle) and a whole host of rollbackers. We have the situation well enough under control. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 15:10, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | :::::A block by any other name is still a block, and a power that really shouldn't be extended below admin-level. It's a power with a huge potential for misuse, and there's a reason we require a community consensus significantly in favor of an RfA candidate to give someone such a power. Right now we have three active admins (myself, Toomai, Nyargle) and a whole host of rollbackers. We have the situation well enough under control. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 15:10, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::::Which would be my opinion too if everyone didn't disagree with it. I suppose the point I'm trying to make in a way is that there is no middle ground, so you're either an admin or you're not, even if you added a halfway house. *Yawns quietly* You know what? I've just remembered why I disliked this idea in the first place... <font face="Agency FB">Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er</font> 15:15, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ::::::Which would be my opinion too if everyone didn't disagree with it. I suppose the point I'm trying to make in a way is that there is no middle ground, so you're either an admin or you're not, even if you added a halfway house. *Yawns quietly* You know what? I've just remembered why I disliked this idea in the first place... <font face="Agency FB">Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er</font> 15:15, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
== Some qualms == | |||
*Is there a way to prevent junior admins from lowering protection just so they can edit pages? | |||
*While it's not absolutely necessary, I would like to lower the max edits for junior admin page deletion, most vandal pages will have five or six edits at most. | |||
*I'd like to put further restrictions on suspension, like only allowing it for new accounts (if possible). | |||
[[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: blue">'''Nyargle'''</span><span style="color: orange">'''blargle'''</span>]] Let's go Mets! ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|Talk]]<span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> [[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 18:52, 24 October 2015 (EDT) | |||