Talk:Peach Bomber: Difference between revisions
Falconpunch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Falconpunch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
P.S: Also, why would Nintendo lie and say Peach attacks with her "hip", when it's BLATANTLY OBVIOUS that it's not? It just doesn't make any sense. [[User:Falconpunch|Falconpunch]] ([[User talk:Falconpunch|talk]]) 18:25, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | P.S: Also, why would Nintendo lie and say Peach attacks with her "hip", when it's BLATANTLY OBVIOUS that it's not? It just doesn't make any sense. [[User:Falconpunch|Falconpunch]] ([[User talk:Falconpunch|talk]]) 18:25, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Correct, it is not used in competitive play for attacking, but rather for recovering (Melee only). Peach Bomber bounces Peach up and back if it hits a wall. This can be used to gain some vertical distance when below the stage (e.g. final destination). Do we say it's powerful, by the way? [[User:Serpent_King|<span style="color:#008833; text-shadow:-1px -1px #00bb77;">'''Serpent King'''</span>]] [[User talk:Serpent_King|(<span style="color: blue;">talk</span>)]] 22:17, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | :Correct, it is not used in competitive play for attacking, but rather for recovering (Melee only). Peach Bomber bounces Peach up and back if it hits a wall. This can be used to gain some vertical distance when below the stage (e.g. final destination). Do we say it's powerful, by the way? [[User:Serpent_King|<span style="color:#008833; text-shadow:-1px -1px #00bb77;">'''Serpent King'''</span>]] [[User talk:Serpent_King|(<span style="color: blue;">talk</span>)]] 22:17, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
::Of course not, since it doesn't even earn that title. Also, I believe since that change from Melee was removed (I never played Melee), it's usefulness is just gone. However, ever since Brawl, Peach can use that move to grab on the edge. I really wish they would buff this move to be more useful, because it being called powerful is questionable. [[User:Falconpunch|Falconpunch]] ([[User talk:Falconpunch|talk]]) 23:07, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | ::Of course not, since it doesn't even earn that title. Also, I believe since that change from Melee was removed (I never played Melee), it's usefulness is just gone. However, ever since Brawl, Peach can use that move to grab on the edge. I really wish they would buff this move to be more useful, because it being called powerful is questionable. Also, I believe Nintendo intended to have this attack be used in competitive play for attacking. [[User:Falconpunch|Falconpunch]] ([[User talk:Falconpunch|talk]]) 23:07, 27 May 2015 (EDT) |
Revision as of 11:03, May 28, 2015
Please, do not revert my recent edit to the page. This wiki is not censored, as we have articles like these. Please leave it this way. It's not her hip. 98.111.95.78 03:41, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- What's a sec kick?
- And it is her hip. No one's butt is that huge. BNK [E|T|C] 12:29, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I edited the IP's post to "sex" kick just so everyone knows. And it's not a matter of "butt" being a "bad word" it's that she's lunging her hip. Kperfekt BURN!!! Revert That! 03:47, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
- It's not her hip, it's her buttocks. This has been easily proved, both by cheat codes which removes her dress, but it can also be proved in-game by using the camera.Sybb (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- This discussion took place over four years ago. I'm sure this dispute has long since ended.
- --- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 12:10, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- Obviously not, since it was still "hip" before I changed it. And now someone felt it was necessary to change "buttocks" to "rear".Sybb (talk) 12:27, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- There was a very clear warning on the page to not change the wording on the article, and "rear" is a euphemism for "buttocks" anyway. PokemonMasterJamal3 (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- I though wikis were handled by everyone, and not by a select elite? Who has the right to decide wording for everyone else? Or is this site privately owned by you?Sybb (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- Yes, wikis are free for anyone to contribute, but admins still manage the site and the warning was added by an admin (Toomai). This was obviously edited into the article several times and it was never met well, as you can clearly tell. PokemonMasterJamal3 (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- I though wikis were handled by everyone, and not by a select elite? Who has the right to decide wording for everyone else? Or is this site privately owned by you?Sybb (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- There was a very clear warning on the page to not change the wording on the article, and "rear" is a euphemism for "buttocks" anyway. PokemonMasterJamal3 (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- Obviously not, since it was still "hip" before I changed it. And now someone felt it was necessary to change "buttocks" to "rear".Sybb (talk) 12:27, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- --- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 12:10, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
Which game did this move come from?
I've never seen it in any Mario game, for that matter.
Bowser vs Bowser Jr. (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2011 (EST)
- It appears to be an original creation for the Smash series, as with many moves. Miles (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2011 (EST)
What is she saying?
When is performing this move, what is she saying? Smashdude10 (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2014 (EDT)
- She just says hi-chya. This is a reference to Kiai. I don't even want to know why you had to ask this. MegaTron1XD 13:25, 15 March 2014 (EDT)
Thanks. The reason why I asked because I was curious. Smashdude10 (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2014 (EDT)
Peach Bomber isn't useful or powerful at all...
Y'know, after playing several games of Smash Bros., I feel like this move isn't "powerful" as Nintendo says it is. It's highly punishable, leaving you open to attacks for one thing. Another thing is that it only does 15% damage (10% in SSB4), and doesn't even gain KO potential until 150%-200%. That's not powerful, nor is it strong! It just feels like a normal move. Honestly, I have NO idea what they define as a "powerful move". I mean, there's lots of strong moves. Warlock Punch is powerful, so is Falcon Punch, Blade Flurry, and even Farore's Wind is powerful. But Peach Bomber is NOT powerful. Y'know, for a special move, this doesn't feel all that "special" in my opinion...
I honestly can't find a single upside or good use for this at all. It's pretty useless, and I don't see it used often in competitive play, either. I like Melee/Brawl's version of this attack better. It doesn't help that it's faster in SSB4, it's still weak. Plus, you could use this attack several times in all versions of the game, and you'd see that Melee/Brawl's version racks up damage faster than SSB4's. If they really want to make this "powerful", they need to HEAVILY buff this attack. How? I dunno, there's lots of ways; They could make it deal more damage and knockback, increase it's reach, or even give Peach Super Armor, I couldn't care less. Making the attack faster but deal less damage makes me feel like it was nerfed overall, limiting it's usefulness. Sorry, but that's how I feel. Peach is still a good character, though.
P.S: Also, why would Nintendo lie and say Peach attacks with her "hip", when it's BLATANTLY OBVIOUS that it's not? It just doesn't make any sense. Falconpunch (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Correct, it is not used in competitive play for attacking, but rather for recovering (Melee only). Peach Bomber bounces Peach up and back if it hits a wall. This can be used to gain some vertical distance when below the stage (e.g. final destination). Do we say it's powerful, by the way? Serpent King (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Of course not, since it doesn't even earn that title. Also, I believe since that change from Melee was removed (I never played Melee), it's usefulness is just gone. However, ever since Brawl, Peach can use that move to grab on the edge. I really wish they would buff this move to be more useful, because it being called powerful is questionable. Also, I believe Nintendo intended to have this attack be used in competitive play for attacking. Falconpunch (talk) 23:07, 27 May 2015 (EDT)