SmashWiki talk:Vandal Harshness: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Dr. Pain 99 (talk | contribs) m (Dr. Pain 99 moved page Talk:Vandal Harshness to SmashWiki talk:Vandal Harshness: pls no go :|O) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
But anyway, you appear to be taking too much of a black-and-white view on things. Several times we have had users who have come back from a block and gone on to become constructive editors. We're not as big as MarioWiki; we don't need to take a hard-line stance like they might. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Orchestral 19:32, 28 February 2015 (EST) | But anyway, you appear to be taking too much of a black-and-white view on things. Several times we have had users who have come back from a block and gone on to become constructive editors. We're not as big as MarioWiki; we don't need to take a hard-line stance like they might. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Orchestral 19:32, 28 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:but have any of the users who have came back from a block and went on to be constructive users afterwards been blocked originally for vandalism. Most of the time if I recall correctly when that happens happened to be if the user was originally blocked for smaller things like Excessive userspace editing (something that Smashwiki punishes with probation), edit warring, inserting false information, or other more minor things like that. Not when they replace entire pages or large portions of one with an inappropriate messages or just completely blanking them. Do you have any examples of people who have done big things like those I described in the previous sentence, get temp-banned for it, and then came back and became constructive users? [[User:MarioIsTheBest|MarioIsTheBest]] ([[User talk:MarioIsTheBest|talk]]) 13:37, 3 March 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 13:37, March 3, 2015
strong support per proposal MarioIsTheBest (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2015 (EST)
We're not MarioWiki. You're not required to manually support your own proposals.
But anyway, you appear to be taking too much of a black-and-white view on things. Several times we have had users who have come back from a block and gone on to become constructive editors. We're not as big as MarioWiki; we don't need to take a hard-line stance like they might. Toomai Glittershine 
The Orchestral 19:32, 28 February 2015 (EST)
- but have any of the users who have came back from a block and went on to be constructive users afterwards been blocked originally for vandalism. Most of the time if I recall correctly when that happens happened to be if the user was originally blocked for smaller things like Excessive userspace editing (something that Smashwiki punishes with probation), edit warring, inserting false information, or other more minor things like that. Not when they replace entire pages or large portions of one with an inappropriate messages or just completely blanking them. Do you have any examples of people who have done big things like those I described in the previous sentence, get temp-banned for it, and then came back and became constructive users? MarioIsTheBest (talk) 13:37, 3 March 2015 (EST)
