SmashWiki:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions
(→Oppose) |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
# | #What is this kind of RFA? [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is bad for me 01:17, 13 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== |
Revision as of 00:17, October 13, 2014
This is the page for requesting adminship for SmashWiki.
Rules & Regulations
- Only self-nominations are allowed. If you think that another member would make a good sysop, then you can convince them to nominate themselves. You cannot make a nomination on behalf of another user.
- After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived.
- Selections of sysops are not a simple vote count, or majority opinion. Users who wish to be promoted should demonstrate a steady commitment to this wiki, and be able to point to reasons that the sysop tools would allow them to do better editing.
- Candidates should describe why the wiki should want them to be sysops, not why they want to be sysops on the wiki.
- When supporting or opposing a candidate, give good reasons. Comments that describe in detail why the candidate should/should not become a sysop carry far more weight than simple support/oppose.
- Rollback status is not required for a successful RfA, but is highly encouraged. Users who only want sysop tools for quick reverts of vandalism will be directed towards the appropriate request.
- Upon request, a prospective sysop may be given a scenario and asked his/her opinion on how s/he would handle it.
- Users that have been blocked in the past, or who have previously made an RfA and failed, are no less eligible for adminship. However, such users should be able to demonstrate how they have improved since the block/previous RfA, lest their RfA find serious opposition.
Past nominations
- For a list of all previous requests for adminship that ended with the candidate's promotion, please see this category.
- For a list of all previous requests for adminship wherein the candidate was not promoted, please see this category.
How to nominate
If you have not had a request for adminship page before, follow this two-step process.
- Go to the end of the requests section below, and add the following text:
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username}}
Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated. - Click on the created red link, and add:
{{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}
However, if you have had a previous request for adminship, follow this process instead.
- Go to the end of the requests section below, and add the following text:
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username (#)}}
Where "Username" is the name of the user being nominated, and where # is 2 for the second RfA, 3 for the third, and so on. - Click on the created red link, and add:
{{subst:rfa|Username|reason for nomination}}
Current requests
GabeZ (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)
Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
I will own both version of Smash Bros 4 immediately upon the release of each, and will be going through them extensively and collecting information on most if not all characters, stages, and modes available in each respective version.
Support
- ...
Oppose
- Zero contributions, two edits solely on this Rfa, what kind of RFA is this? ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is bad for me 01:17, 13 October 2014 (EDT)
Neutral
- ...
GabeZ (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)
Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
I will own both version of Smash Bros 4 immediately upon the release of each, and will be going through them extensively and collecting information on most if not all characters, stages, and modes available in each respective version.
Support
- ...
Oppose
- What is this kind of RFA? ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is bad for me 01:17, 13 October 2014 (EDT)
Neutral
- ...