Talk:Thorn helix: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Deletion== | ==Deletion== | ||
'''Oppose''': Once a hazard, always a hazard. It doesn't matter that it only appeared in two levels, it's still a unique 'enemy' with its own hitboxes. It may be minor, but as the definitive Super Smash Bros. wiki, the only wiki on which the thorn helix would matter, our scope should still cover this type of thing. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]] 17:10, 28 July 2014 (EDT) | '''Oppose''': Once a hazard, always a hazard. It doesn't matter that it only appeared in two levels, it's still a unique 'enemy' with its own hitboxes. It may be minor, but as the definitive Super Smash Bros. wiki, the only wiki on which the thorn helix would matter, our scope should still cover this type of thing. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]] 17:10, 28 July 2014 (EDT) | ||
'''Oppose'''. No reason to get rid of this. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 17:11, 28 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:11, July 28, 2014
Title
Since this has to get moved to a singular title anyway, what do you say to the name I was planning to give of "Thorn Helix"? Toomai Glittershine 
The SMASH-GINEER 13:19, 2 October 2011 (EDT)
Deletion
Oppose: Once a hazard, always a hazard. It doesn't matter that it only appeared in two levels, it's still a unique 'enemy' with its own hitboxes. It may be minor, but as the definitive Super Smash Bros. wiki, the only wiki on which the thorn helix would matter, our scope should still cover this type of thing. Toast 
ltimatum 17:10, 28 July 2014 (EDT)
Oppose. No reason to get rid of this. Miles (talk) 17:11, 28 July 2014 (EDT)
