SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Awesomelink234: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose: kind of messed up right now.) |
m (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::4/10, plz comment OT. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 22:10, 19 July 2014 (EDT) | ::4/10, plz comment OT. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 22:10, 19 July 2014 (EDT) | ||
#'''Oppose''' First of all there isn't a lot of edits, second, most of the edits are just minor corrections. I just didn't see enough experience here. Most of the passed RfAs have been on this Wiki a lot longer than a year. | #'''Oppose''' First of all there isn't a lot of edits, second, most of the edits are just minor corrections. I just didn't see enough experience here. Most of the passed RfAs have been on this Wiki a lot longer than a year. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is a never lover boy 22:15, 19 July 2014 (EDT) | ||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== | ||
Revision as of 21:15, July 19, 2014
Awesomelink234 (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)
Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
So here's my admin request. First, I've never caused any conflicts. Second, I'm on this wiki almost every day. Third, I HATE vandalism and the people who do it, so I could rollback, or if I SERIOUSLY had to, ...BAN. I'll let the admins decide the rest.
Support
- ...
Oppose
- You don't even have 50 edits. RickTommy 22:09, 19 July 2014 (EDT)
- 100% legitimate support that is totally not fake - This user has proven himself to be a very <INSERT COMPLIMENT HERE> user. He should be an admin because he clearly knows what to do, even though he hasn't contributed a significant thing at all. His big ego must be backed by a clear history of good adminship on a Wiki that is completely relevant to our Wiki, community and policy wise.
- Oppose First of all there isn't a lot of edits, second, most of the edits are just minor corrections. I just didn't see enough experience here. Most of the passed RfAs have been on this Wiki a lot longer than a year. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is a never lover boy 22:15, 19 July 2014 (EDT)
Neutral
- ...
